Using Kintsch's discourse comprehension theory to model the user's coding of an informative message from an enabling information retrieval system

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 1033-1046

  Cole, Charles ^a   Mandelblatt, Bertie ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); INFORMATION ANALYSIS; ONLINE SEARCHING;

KINTSCH'S DISCOURSE COMPREHENSION THEORY;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034274077     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1005>3.0.CO;2-2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Allen, B.S. (1992). Constructive criticisms. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 183-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, J.A. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249-277.
3. Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W.H. Freeman.
4. Anderson, J.R., & Bower, G.H. (1973). Human associative memory. New York: Holt.
5. Baldonado, M.Q.W., & Winograd, T. (1997). SenseMaker: An information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user's interests. CHI'97 Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, March 22-27, 1997 (pp. 11-18). New York: ACM Press.
6. Barnard, P.H. (1987). Cognitive resources and learning of human-computer dialogs. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 112-158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Belkin, N.J. (1984). Cognitive models and information transfer. Social Science Information Studies, 4, 111-129.
8. Belkin, N.J., Cool, C., Stein, A., & Thiel, U. (1995). Cases, scripts, and information-seeking strategies: On the design of interactive information retrieval systems. Expert Systems With Applications, 9, 379-395.
9. Cole, C., Cantero, P., & Sauvé, D. (1998). Intelligent information retrieval: Part II: Diagnosing information need: Uncertainty expansion: A prototype of a diagnostic IR tool. Information Processing and Management, 34(6), 721-737.
10. Cole, C., Cantero, P., & Ungar, A. (2000). The development of a diagnostic-prescriptive tool for undergraduates seeking information for a social science/humanities assignment: Part III. Enabling devices. Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 481-500.
11. Cole, C. & Mandelblatt, B. (in preparation). Intelligent information retrieval. Part V. The efficacy of high recall search strategy for undergraduates at the beginning of the research process.
12. Croft, W.B. (1987). Approaches to intelligent information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 23, 249-254.
13. Dewdney, P. & Ross, C.S. (1994). Flying a light aircraft: Reference service evaluation from a user's viewpoint. RQ, 34(2), 217-230.