Testing the condon approximation for electron transfer via the Mulliken-Hush model

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 104, Issue 37, 2000, Pages 8566-8569

  Toutounji, Mohamad M ^a   Ratner, Mark A ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CALCULATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOLECULES; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

AB INITIO METHODS; CONDON APPROXIMATION; ELECTRON TRANSFER; ELECTRONIC COUPLING MATRIX ELEMENT; MIXING MATRIX ELEMENT; MULLIKEN-HUSH MODEL; NUCLEAR GEOMETRY; SEMIEMPIRICAL METHOD;

ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034269948     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp001271z     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Beratan, D. N.; Onuchic, J. N.; Betts, J. N.; Bowler, B. E.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7915.
2. Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265.
3. Wasielewski, M. R. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 435.
4. Hopfield, J. J.; Onuchic, J. N.; Beratan, D. N. Science 1988, 241, 817.
5. Aviram, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5687.
6. Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. In Molecular Electronics-Science and Tecnology; Aviram, A., Ed.; U.S. Engineering Foundation: New York, 1989.
7. Rainer, M.; Jortner, J. In Molecular Electronics; Jortner, J., Ratner, M., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, U.K., 1997, and references therein.
8. Hong, F. T. Molecular Electronics; Plénum: New York, 1988.
9. Petty, M. C.; Bryce, M. R.; Bloor, D. Introduction to Molecular Electronics; Oxford University Press: London, 1995.
10. Birge, R. R. Molecular and Biomolecular Electronics; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1994.
11. Moser, C. C.; Keske, J. M.; Warncke, K.; Farid, R. S.; Dutton, P. L. Nature 1992, 355, 796.
12. Bolton, J.; McLendon; Malaga, N. Electron Transfer in Inorganic, Organic, and Biological Systems; ACS Adv. Chem. Ser.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1991; Vol. 228.
13. Bowler, B. E.; Meade, T. J.; Mayo, S. L.; Richards. J. H.; Gray, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8757.
14. McLendon, G. Ace. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 260.
15. Larsson, S. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1983, 79, 1375.
16. Joachim, C. Chem. Phys. 1987, 116, 339.
17. Van de Kamp, M. C.; Fions, R.; Hall, F. C.; Canters, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112 (2), 907.
18. Barbara, P. F.; Oison, E. J. C. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1999, 707, 647.
19. Berlin, Y. A.; Burin, A. L.; Ratner, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 443.
20. Ondrechen, M. J.; Ko, J.; Root, L. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 24, 5919.
21. Hupp, J. T.; Neyhart, G.; Meyer, T. J.; Kober, E. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 24, 5919.
22. Hupp, J. T.; Neyhart, G.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5349.
23. McConnell, H. M. /. Chem. Phys. 1961, 35, 508.
24. Larsson, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4034.
25. Kallebring, B.; Larsson, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987,138,76.
26. Plato, M.; Mobius, K.; Michel-Beyerie, M. E.; Bixon, M. E.; Jortner, J. J. Ain. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7279.
27. Cave, R. J.; Baxter, D. V.; Goddard, W. A., Ill; Baldescheiler, J. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 926.
28. Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,30,95 and references therein;
29. Newton, M. D. In Cluster Models for Surface and Bulk Phenomena; Pacchioni, G., et al., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1992.
30. Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 30.
31. Broo, A.; Larsson, S. Chem. Phys. 1992, 161, 363.
32. Newton, M. D.; Ohta, K.; Zhong, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,95,2317.
33. Jordan, K. D.; Paddon-Row, M. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1992,96,1188.
34. Curtiss, L. A.; Naleway, C. A.; Miller, J. R. /. Phys Chem. 1993, 97, 4050. '
35. Liang, C.; Newton, M. D. /. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 2855.
36. Braga, M.; Larsson, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 213, 217 1993.
37. Braga, M.; Broo, A.; Larsson, S. Chem: Phys. 1991, 156, 1.
38. Ratner, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 94, 4877.
39. Newton, M. D. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 767.
40. Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 706, 9213.
41. Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 249, 15.
42. Mulliken, R. S.; Person, W. B. Molecular Complexes; Wiley: New York, 1969.
43. Hush, N. S. Prog, tnorg. Chem. 1967, 5, 391.
44. Hush, N. S. Eleclrochim. Acta 1968,13, 1005.
45. Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9773.
46. Creutz, C.; Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1994, 82,47.
47. Patcher, T.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Koppel, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 7367.
48. Cederbaum, L. S.; Schirmer, J.; Meyer, H.-D. J. Phys. A 1988, 22, 2427.
49. Patcher, T.; Koppel, H.; Cederbaum, L. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95,6668.
50. Pacher, T.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Koppel, H. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1993, 84, 293.
51. Sachs, S. B.; Dudek, S. P.; Hsung, R. P.; Sita, L. R.; Smally, J. F.; Newton, M. D.; Feldberg, S. W.; Chidsey, C. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10563.
52. Schatz, C. G.; Ratner, M. A. Quantum Mechanics in Chemistry; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
53. Head-Gordon, M.; Grana, A. A.; Maurice, D.; White, C. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 14261.
54. Del Bene, J. E.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 2236.
55. Foresman, J. B.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 135.
56. Maurice, D.; Head-Gordon, M. Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1995, 29, 361.
57. Bouman, T. D.; Hansen, A. E. Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1989, 23, 381.
58. Hansen, A. E.; Voigt, B.; Rettrup, S. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1983, 23, 595.
59. Linderberg, J.; Ohrn, Y. Propagators in Quantum Chemistry; Academic Press: London, 1973.
60. Xiang-Yuan. L.; Fu-Chen, H. J. Compta. Chem. 1999, 20, 597.
61. Dunning, T. H.; McKoy, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 1735.
62. The CIS default settings yield the ground-state dipole moment and the transition dipole moment, but not the excited-state dipole moment. As a result, the force field option was chosen for the JOBTYPE in the Srem block. (Note that this option is not available for ROCIS, and therefore the multipole_field block, along with the finite difference method, has to be utilized in order to compute the excited-state dipole moment.). Both methods, however, were used to compute ground and excited sates dipole moments, for confirmation purposes, yielding exact agreement. While Zindo is not set up to compute dipole moments for charged molecules, Q-Chem is.
63. A problem occurred involving the RPA instability at 0 = 90°. Use of the RPA leads to accurate transition properties for many systems, but it can also produce numerical instabilities and complex excitation energies when HF instability occurs. As a result in all the calculations (except EH) we went only up to θ -85° (cf., e.g.: Thouless, D. J. The Quantum Mechanics of Many-Body Systems; Academic Press: New York and London, 1972.).
64. Ratner, M. A.; Madhukar, A. Chem. Phys. 1974, 61, 3344.
65. Brunschwig, B. S.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 19, 7454.
66. Daizadeh, I.; Medvedev, E. S.; Stuchebrukhov, A. A. P. Natl. Acad. Sei U.S.A. 1997, 8, 3703.