Comparison of several design augmentation strategies

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 435-449

  Nelson, Benjamin J ^a   Montgomery, Douglas C ^b   Elias, Russell J ^c   Maass, Eric ^d  

^a WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ON SEMICONDUCTOR   (United States)

^d MOTOROLA INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

FRACTIONATED FACTORIAL DESIGN; PLACKETT-BURMAN DESIGN THEORY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0034268568     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1638(200009/10)16:5<435::AID-QRE352>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments (4th edn). John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1997.
2. Plackett RL, Burman JP. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 1946; 33:305-325.
3. Hamada M, Wu CFJ. Analysis of designed experiments with complex aliasing. Journal of Quality Technology 1992; 24(3):130-137.
4. Lin DKJ, Draper NR. Projection properties of Plackett and Burman designs. Technometrics 1992; 34(4):423-428.
5. Montgomery DC, Borror CM, Stanley JD. Some cautions in the use of Plackett-Burman designs. Quality Engineering 1997; 10:371-381.
6. n designs. Biometrics 1962; 172-179.
7. n-k) designs. Technometrics 1964; 6(4):371-376.
8. Johns PWM. Augmenting fractional of factorial designs: algorithmic vs D-optimal methods. Presentation at Austin, Texas Design of Experiments Conference, May 1995.
9. Lenth RV. Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics 1989; 31(4):469-473.