Development of Parkbench and performance prediction

International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 205-215

  Hey, Tony ^a   Lancaster, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS);

PARALLEL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS;

PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034267363     PISSN: 10943420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109434200001400304     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Addison, C. A., Getov, V. S., Hey, A.J.G., Hockney, R. W., and Wolton, I. C. 1991. The GENESIS distributed memory benchmarks. In Computer Benchmarks, eds. J. Dongarra and W. Gentzsch. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Bailey, D. H. 1991. Twelve ways to fool the masses when giving performance results on parallel computers. Supercomputer 45:4-7.
3. Bailey, D. H., Barszcz, E., Barton, J. T., Browning, D. S., Carter, R. L., Dagum, D., Fatoohi, R. A., Frederickson, P. O., Lasinski, T. A., Schreiber, R. S., et al. 1991. The NAS parallel benchmarks. Int. J. Supercomputer Applications 5 (3): 63-73.
4. Berry, M., Chen, D., and Koss, P. 1989. The perfect club benchmarks: Effective performance evaluation of supercomputers. Int. J. Supercomputer Applications 3 (1): 5-40.
5. Curnow, H. J., and Wichmann, B. A. 1976. A synthetic benchmark. Computer Journal 19 (1): 43-59.
6. Deelman, E., Dube, A., Hoisie, A., Luo, Y., Oliver, R. L., Sundaram-Stukel, D., Wasserman, H., Adve, V. S., Bagrodia, R., Browne, J. C., et al. 1998. POEMS: End-to-End Performance Design of Large Parallel Adaptive Computational Systems [Online]. Available: http://www. cs.utexas.edu/users/poems
7. Dongarra, J. J. 1996. Performance of various computers using standard linear equation software. Report CS-89-85, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
8. Dunlop, A. N., and Hey, A.J.G. 1997. PERFORM: A fast simulator for estimating program execution time. Electronic Journal of Performance Evaluation and Modelling of Computer Systems.
9. Eigenmann, R., and Hassanzadeh, S. 1996. Benchmarking with real industrial applications: The SPEC high-performance group. IEEE Comp. Sc. & Eng. 3:18-23.
10. Eigenmann, R., Hoeflinger, J., and Padua, D. 1998. On the automatic parallelization of the perfect benchmarks. EEE Trans. of Prl. and Dist. Sys. 9 (1): 5-23.
11. Foster, I., and Kesselman, C., eds. 1998. The GRID: Blueprint for a New Computer Infrastructure. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
12. Hernández, E., and Hey, A.J.G. 1998. White-Box Benchmarking [Online]. Available: http://www.usb.ve/emilio/WhiteBox.ps
13. Hockney, R., and Berry, M., eds. 1994. Public international benchmarks for parallel computers. Scientific Programming 3:101-104.
14. McMahon, F. K. 1986. The Livermore Fortran kernels: A computer test of numerical performance range. Technical Report UCRL-53745, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The Science of Computer Benchmarking. 1996. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
15. van der Steen, A. J. 1991. The benchmark of the EuroBen group. Parallel Computing 17:1211-1221.
16. van der Steen, A. J., and van der Pas, R. J. 1998. Benchmarking the Silicon Graphics Origin 2000 System. Technical Report WFI-98-2, Department of Computational Physics, Utrecht University.