Planning for community-based evaluation

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 351-357

  Cockerill, Rhonda ^a   Myers, Ted ^b   Allman, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034259124     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821400002100306     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ayers, T. (1987). Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder collaborative approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 263-271.
2. Chavis, D., Stucky, P., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Returning basic research to the community: A relationship between scientist and citizen. American Psychologist, 38(4), 424-434.
3. Cheadle, A., Wagner, E., Koepsell, T., Kristal, A., & Patrick, D. (1992). Environmental indicators: A tool for evaluating community based health promotion programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 8, 345-350.
4. Chelimsky, E. (1997). The political environment of evaluation and what it means for the development of the field. In E. Chelimsky & W. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century (pp. 53-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Creswell, D. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6. Datta, L. (1997). A pragmatic basis for mixed-method designs. In J. Greene & V. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in Mixed-method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms (pp. 33-46). New Directions for Evaluation, 74. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Fetterman, D. (1997). Empowerment evaluation and accreditation in higher education. In E. Chelimsky & W. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century (pp. 381-395). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1990). An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41-54.
9. Forrester, K., & Ward, K. (1992). The potential and limitations: Participatory research in a university context. In K. Forrester & K. Ward (Eds.), A World of Communities: Participatory Research Perspectives (pp. 165-184). North York, Ontario: Captus University Publications.
10. Greene, J., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. Greene & V. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in Mixed-method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms (pp. 5-18). New Directions for Evaluation, 74. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Health and Welfare Canada. (1989/1990). Developing knowledge for health promotion in Canada: Summary report on research priorities and strategies. Health Promotion, 28(3), 1-14.
12. Israel, B., Schurman, S., & Hugentobler, M. (1992). Conducting action research: Relationships between organizational members and researchers. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 28, 74-101.
13. Kaye, G. (1990). A community organizer's perspective on citizen participation research and the research-practitioner partnership. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 151-157.
14. Mellor, M. (1988). Ethics and accountability: Participatory research in a worker co-operative. Convergence, 21, 73-81.
15. Mertens, D. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1-14.
16. Pederson, A., Edwards, R., Kelnor, M., Marshall, V., & Allison, K. (1988). Coordinating Healthy Public Policy: An Analytic Literature Review and Bibliography. Ottawa: Health and Welfare Canada.
17. Posavac, E., & Carey, R. (1997). Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (1994). The relationship between the qualitative and quantitative research traditions. In C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The Quantitative-qualitative Debate: New Perspectives (pp. 5-12). New Directions for Program Evaluation, 61. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Rossi, P., Freeman, H., & Lipsey, M. (1999). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (6th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Schroes, C. J., Murphy-Berman, V., & Chambers, J. M. (2000). Empowerment evaluation applied: Experiences, analysis, and recommendations from a case study. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(1), 53-64.
21. Schwandt, T. (1997). The landscape of values in evaluation: Charted terrain and unexplored territory. In D. Founder & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Progress and Future Directions in Evaluation: Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Methods (pp. 25-40). New Directions for Evaluation, 76. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Sommer, R. (1987). An experimental investigation of the action research approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Research, 23, 185-199.