메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 524-531

How can hospital futility policies contribute to establishing standards of practice?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0034258114     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180100904110     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (20)

References (24)
  • 2
    • 85037768115 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C.A. #139dd (West 1992)
    • 2. Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C.A. #139dd (West 1992).
  • 3
    • 85037754191 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 1
    • 3. See note 1.
  • 4
    • 0028512680 scopus 로고
    • Medical futility: Strike two
    • 4. Capron A. Medical futility: strike two. Hastings Center Report 1994;24(5):42-3.
    • (1994) Hastings Center Report , vol.24 , Issue.5 , pp. 42-43
    • Capron, A.1
  • 5
    • 85037760585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bryan v. Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 95 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 1996). The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Bryan's suit, which had been brought in federal court under EMTALA, yet recognized that a state tort law action might lie. Such reprehensible disregard for one's patient as Bryan hypothesizes would not constitute the "dumping" at which EMTALA aims but the well established tort of abandonment, which the states may expand or constrict as they deem just but which Congress evidenced no desire to federalize. Presumptively aware of this feature of state tort law, Congress did not address a hypothetical problem that was not before it but addressed a national scandal that was: emergency rooms turning away patients at the door for inability to pay or other similar reasons. Id at 352
    • 5. Bryan v. Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 95 F.3d 349 (4th Cir. 1996). The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Bryan's suit, which had been brought in federal court under EMTALA, yet recognized that a state tort law action might lie. Such reprehensible disregard for one's patient as Bryan hypothesizes would not constitute the "dumping" at which EMTALA aims but the well established tort of abandonment, which the states may expand or constrict as they deem just but which Congress evidenced no desire to federalize. Presumptively aware of this feature of state tort law, Congress did not address a hypothetical problem that was not before it but addressed a national scandal that was: emergency rooms turning away patients at the door for inability to pay or other similar reasons. Id at 352.
  • 6
    • 0029650282 scopus 로고
    • Court ruling limits rights of patients: Care deemed futile may be withheld
    • Apr
    • 6. Kolata G. Court ruling limits rights of patients: care deemed futile may be withheld. New York Times 1995;22 Apr:6.
    • (1995) New York Times , vol.22 , pp. 6
    • Kolata, G.1
  • 7
    • 0029335952 scopus 로고
    • Abandoning a waning life
    • 7. Capron A. Abandoning a waning life. Hastings Center Report 1995;25(4):24-6.
    • (1995) Hastings Center Report , vol.25 , Issue.4 , pp. 24-26
    • Capron, A.1
  • 10
    • 0028780747 scopus 로고
    • Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care: The case of Baby K
    • 10. Annas GJ. Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care: the case of Baby K. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;330:1542-5.
    • (1994) New England Journal of Medicine , vol.330 , pp. 1542-1545
    • Annas, G.J.1
  • 12
    • 0029784281 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility
    • 12. Halevy A, Brody BA. A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility. JAMA 1996;276:571-4.
    • (1996) JAMA , vol.276 , pp. 571-574
    • Halevy, A.1    Brody, B.A.2
  • 13
    • 0028486960 scopus 로고
    • GUIDe (Guidelines for the Use of Intensive Care in Denver): A community effort to define futile and inappropriate care
    • 13. Murphy DJ, Barbour E. GUIDe (Guidelines for the Use of Intensive Care in Denver): a community effort to define futile and inappropriate care. New Horizons 1994;2:326-31.
    • (1994) New Horizons , vol.2 , pp. 326-331
    • Murphy, D.J.1    Barbour, E.2
  • 14
    • 0033125313 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nonbeneficial or futile medical treatment: Conflict resolution guidelines for the San Francisco bay area
    • 14. Bay Area Network of Ethics Committees (BANEC) Nonbeneficial Treatment Working Group. Nonbeneficial or futile medical treatment: conflict resolution guidelines for the San Francisco Bay Area. Western Journal of Medicine 1999:170:287-90.
    • (1999) Western Journal of Medicine , vol.170 , pp. 287-290
  • 15
    • 0003705423 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chicago: American Medical Association, #2.037 adopted Dec.
    • 15. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. Chicago: American Medical Association, #2.037 (adopted Dec. 1996. 1998:10.
    • (1996) Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations , pp. 10
  • 16
    • 85037761476 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 14, BANEC Nonbeneficial Treatment Working Group 1999
    • 16. See note 14, BANEC Nonbeneficial Treatment Working Group 1999.
  • 17
    • 0027439439 scopus 로고
    • Decisions near the end of life: Professional views of life-sustaining treatments
    • 17. Solomon MZ, O'Donnell L, Jennings B, et al. Decisions near the end of life: professional views of life-sustaining treatments. American Journal of Public Health 1993;82:14-25.
    • (1993) American Journal of Public Health , vol.82 , pp. 14-25
    • Solomon, M.Z.1    O'Donnell, L.2    Jennings, B.3
  • 18
    • 0023479435 scopus 로고
    • Moral distress in nursing practice: Experience and effect
    • 18. Wilkinson JM. Moral distress in nursing practice: experience and effect. Nurse Forum 1987-88; 23:16-28.
    • (1987) Nurse Forum , vol.23 , pp. 16-28
    • Wilkinson, J.M.1
  • 19
    • 0003705423 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chicago: American Medical Association, #2.035 issued June
    • 19. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. Chicago: American Medical Association, #2.035 (issued June 1994).
    • (1994) Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations
  • 20
    • 0033540998 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Medical futility in end-of-life care
    • 20. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Medical futility in end-of-life care. JAMA 1999;281:937-41.
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.281 , pp. 937-941
  • 21
    • 85037762338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See note 11, Yankelovich 1991
    • 21. See note 11, Yankelovich 1991.
  • 22
    • 0003472871 scopus 로고
    • Coordinating Council on Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment Decision Making by the Courts. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.
    • 22. National Center for State Courts, Coordinating Council on Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment Decision Making by the Courts. Guidelines for State Court Decision Making in Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment Cases 2nd ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co., 1993.
    • (1993) Guidelines for State Court Decision Making in Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment Cases 2nd Ed.
  • 23
    • 0033126320 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Respect for patients should dominate health care decisions
    • 23. Alpers A. Respect for patients should dominate health care decisions. Western Journal of Medicine 1999;170:291-2.
    • (1999) Western Journal of Medicine , vol.170 , pp. 291-292
    • Alpers, A.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.