Intergroup relations in a changing political context: The case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 733-744

  Hortaçsu, Nuran ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034257803     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<733::AID-EJSP21>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bettencourt BA, Brewer MB, Croak MR, Miller N. 1992. Cooperation and reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28: 301-319.
2. Bosveld W, Koomen W, van der Pligt J. 1996. Estimating group size: effects of category membership, differential construal and selective exposure. European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 523-535.
3. Cinnirella M. 1998. Exploring temporal aspects of social identity: the concept of possible social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 227-248.
4. Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Validzic A. 1998. Intergroup Bias: status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 109-120.
5. Duckitt J, Mphuthing T. 1998. Group identification and intergroup attitudes: a longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 80-85.
6. Durakbasa A. 1998. Kemalism as identity politics in Turkey. In Deconstructing Images of 'The Turkish Woman', Arat ZF (ed.). Macmillan: Bloomsburg, PA; 139-156.
7. Ellemers N, Kortekaas P, Ouwerkerk JW. 1999. Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 371-389.
8. Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. 1997. Sticking together or falling apart: in-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of personality and Social Psychology 72: 617-626.
9. Ellemers N, van Rijswick W. 1997. Identity needs versus social opportunities: the use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly 60: 52-65.
10. Fiske ST, Neuberg SL. 1990. A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23, Zanna MP (ed.). Academic Press: San Diego; 1-74.
11. Franco FM, Maass A. 1999. Intentional control over prejudice: when the choice of the measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 469-477.
12. Gaertner SL, Rust MC, Dovidio JF, Bachman BA, Anastasio PA. 1996. The contact hypothesis: the role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In What's Social about Social Cognition? Nye JL, Brower AM (eds). Sage: London; 230-260.
13. Gaertner L, Schopler J. 1998. Perceived ingroup entitavity and intergroup bias: an interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 963-980.
14. Greenland K, Brown R. 1999. Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 503-521.
15. Haslam SA, Turner JC. 1992. Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology 22: 251-277.
16. Haslam SA, Turner JC, Oakes PJ, McGarty C, Hayes B. 1992. Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology 22: 3-20.
17. İlyasoǧlu A. 1998. Islamist women in Turkey: their identity and self-image. In Deconstructing Images of 'The Turkish Woman', Arat ZF (ed.). Macmillan: Bloomsburg, PA; 241-262.
18. Islam MR, Hewstone M. 1993. Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19: 700-710.
19. Jackson JW, Smith ER. 1999. Conceptualizing social identity: a framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 120-135.
20. Jetten J, Spears R, Manstead ASR. 1996. Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive social categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 1222-1233.
21. Kinket B, Verkuyten M. 1999. Intergroup evaluation and social context: a multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 219-237.
22. Kirshler E, Palmonari A, Pombeni ML. 1994. Social categorization processes between groups: a step into adolescents' peer groups. Journal of Social Psychology 24: 541-563.
23. Lindeman M, Koskela P. 1994. Group size, controllability of group membership, and comparative dimensions as determinants of intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology 24: 267-278.
24. Linville PW, Fischer GW. 1993. Examplar and abstraction models of perceived group variability and stereotypicality. Social Cognition 11: 92-125.
25. Marques JM, Abrams D, Paez D, Martinez-Taboada C. 1998. The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75: 976-988.
26. Mlicki PP, Ellemers N. 1996. Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 97-114.
27. Mullen B, Johnson C, Anthony T. 1994. Relative group size and cognitive representations of ingroup and outgroup. The phenomenology of being in a group. Small Group Research 25: 250-266.
28. Ng SH, Cram F. 1988. Intergroup bias by defensive and offensive groups in majority and minority conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 749-757.
29. Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, Turner JC. 1994. Stereotyping and Social Reality. Blackwell: Oxford.
30. Özdalga E. 1998. The Veiling Issue, Official Secularism and Popular Islam in Modern Turkey. Curzon Press: Richmond, Surrey.
31. Reicher S, Levine RM. 1994. On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology 24: 511-524.
32. Reicher S, Levine M. 1994. Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: the effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology 33: 145-163.
33. Ruggiero KM, Taylor DM. 1997. Why minority members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: the role of self esteem and perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 373-389.
34. Sanders GS, Mullen B. 1982. Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions. European Journal of Social Psychology 46: 190-207.
35. Sherif M. 1966. Group Conflict and Co-operation. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd: London.
36. Simon B. 1992. The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: reintroducing the Intergroup Context. In European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 3, Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 1-30.
37. Simon B, Hastedt C. 1999. Self-aspects as social categories: the role of personal importance and valence. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 479-487.
38. Simon B, Loewy M, Stürmer S, Weber U, Freytag P, Habig C. 1998. Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 646-658.
39. Tajfel H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
40. Tiraboschi M, Maas A. 1998. Reactions to perceived deprivation in in-groups and out-groups: a cross-cultural comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 403-421.
41. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
42. Verkuyten M, Drabbles M, Van Den Nieuwenhuijzen K. 1999. Self-categorization and emotional reactions to ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 605-619.