Failure at object identification improves mirror image matching

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1229-1234

  Warrington, Elizabeth K ^a   Davidoff, Jules ^b  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; APTITUDE; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDENTITY; PERFORMANCE; POSITION; RECOGNITION; ROTATION;

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; BRAIN; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034257085     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00040-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Balota D.A., Ferraro F.R. Lexical, sublexical and implicit memory processes in healthy young and healthy older adults and in individual with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology. 10:1996;82-95.
2. Biederman I., Blickle T.W., Teitelbaum R.C., Klatzky G.J. Object search in nonsense displays. J. Exp. Psych.: Learn. Mem. Cog. 14:1988;456-467.
3. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognising depth-rotated objects: evidence for 3-D viewpoint invariance. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Perc. Perf. 19:1993;1162-1182.
4. Corballis M.C. Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psych. Rev. 95:1988;115-123.
5. Davidoff J., Warrington E.K. A dissociation of shape discrimination and figure-ground perception in a patient with normal acuity. Neuropsychologia. 31:1993;83-93.
6. Davidoff J., Warrington E.K. The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment. Neuropsychologia. 37:1999;279-292.
7. de Gelder B., Bachoud-Lévi A.-C., Degos J.D. Inversion superiority in visual agnosia may be common to a variety of orientation polarised objects besides faces. Vision Research. 38:1998;2855-2861.
8. de Gelder B, Rouw R. Structural encoding precludes recognition of face parts in prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology (in press).
9. Farah M., Wilson K., Drain H., Tanaka J. The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research. 35:1995;2089-2093.
10. Gregory R.L. The intelligent eye. 1970;Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.
11. Gross C.G. Inferior temporal lesions do not impair discrimination of rotated patterns in monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92:1978;1095-1109.
12. He Z., Nakayama K. Surfaces versus features visual search. Nature. 359:1992;231-233.
13. Hécaen H., Ajuriaguerra J. Agnosie visuelle pour les objets inanimes par lesion unilaterale gauche. Rev. Neurol. 94:1956;222-223.
14. Kartsounis L., Warrington E.K. A dissociation of shape discrimination and figure-ground perception in a patient with normal acuity. Neuropsychologia. 29:1991;969-980.
15. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psych. Bull. 109:1991;163-203.
16. Marr D. Vision. 1982;W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
17. Morton J. A singular lack of incidental learning. Nature. 215:1967;203-204.
18. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M.A. A standardised set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psych: Human Perc. Perf. 6:1980;174-215.
19. Stankiewicz B.J., Hummel J.E., Cooper E.E. The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape. J. Exp. Psych.: Human Perc. Perf. 24:1998;732-744.
20. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: an object inferiority effect. J. Exp. Psych.: Human Perc. Perf. 21:1995;901-913.
21. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural descriptions or by multiple views. J. Exp. Psych. Hum. Perc. Perf. 21:1995;1495-1505.
22. Tumbull O.H., Laws K.R., McCarthy R.A. Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation. Cortex. 31:1995;387-395.
23. Turnbull O.H., McCarthy R.A. Failure to discriminate between mirror-image objects: a case of viewpoint-independent object recognition? Neurocase. 2:1996;63-72.
24. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Ingle, et al. Analysis of visual behavior. 1982;MIT Press, Cambridge.
25. Walsh V., Butler S.R. The effects of visual cortex lesions on the perception of rotated shapes. Behav. Brain Res. 76:1996;127-142.
26. Walsh V., Ellison A., Batelli L., Cowey A. Task-specific impairments and enhancements induced by magnetic stimulation of human visual area V5. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B. 265:1998;537-543.
27. Warrington E.K. The Camden memory tests manual. 1996;Psychology Press: Hove, Hove.
28. Warrington E.K., James M. Visual apperceptive agnosia: a clinico-anatomical study of three cases. Cortex. 24:1988;13-32.
29. Warrington E.K., James M. Visual object and space perception battery. 1991;Thames Valley, Bury St Edmunds.
30. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configural information in face perception. Perception. 16:1987;747-759.