Characterization of the photosynthetic induction response in a Populus species with stomata barely responding to light changes

Tree Physiology

Volumn 20, Issue 14, 2000, Pages 969-976

  Tang, Yanhong ^a   Liang, Naishen ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Light fluctuation; Sunflecks; Water stress

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; LIGHT; PHOTON FLUX DENSITY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAF; STEADY STATE; STOMA CONDUCTANCE; WATER POTENTIAL;

POPULUS; POPULUS KOREANA; POPULUS TRICHOCARPA;

EID: 0034254396     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/20.14.969     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allen, M.T. and R.W. Pearcy. 2000a. Stomatal behavior and photosynthetic performance under dynamic light regimes in a seasonally dry tropical rain forest. Oecologia 122:470-478.
2. Allen, M.T. and R.W. Pearcy. 2000b. Stomatal versus biochemical limitations to dynamic photosynthetic performance in four tropical rainforest shrub species. Oecologia 122:479-486.
3. Chazdon, R.L. 1988. Sunflecks and their importance to forest understory plants. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18:1-63.
4. Chazdon, R.L. and R.W. Pearcy. 1986. Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rain forest species. I. Induction under constant and fluctuating light conditions. Oecologia 69:524-531.
5. Cochard, H., M. Ridolfi and E. Dreyer. 1996. Responses to water stress in an ABA-unresponsive hybrid poplar, Populus koreana × trichocarpa cv. Peace. New Phytol. 134:455-46.
6. Comic, G. and A. Massacci. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In Photosynthesis and the Environment. Ed. N.R. Barber. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 347-366.
7. Furukawa, A., S.Y. Park and Y. Fujinuma. 1990. Hybrid poplar stomata unresponsive to changes in environmental conditions. Trees 4:191-197.
8. 4 wetland species in a tropical swamp. J. Ecol. 76:253-262.
9. Knapp, A.K. and W.K. Smith. 1990. Stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight. Plant Physiol. 78:160-165.
10. Koch, M.S. and P.S. Rawlik. 1993. Transpiration and stomatal conductance of two wetland macrophytes (Cladium jamaicense and Typha domingensis) in the subtropical Everglades. Am. J. Bot. 80:1146-1154.
11. Kubiske, M.E., M.D. Abrams and S.A. Mostoller. 1996. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations of photosynthesis in relation to the drought and shade tolerance of tree species in open and understory environments. Trees 11:76-82.
12. Pearcy, R.W. 1990. Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41:421-453.
13. Pearcy, R.W., O. Katherine and H.W. Calkin. 1985. Photosynthetic responses to dynamic light environments by Hawaiian trees. Plant Physiol. 79:896-902.
14. Pearcy, R.W., J.P. Krall and G.F. Sassenrath-Cole. 1996. Photosynthesis in fluctuating light environments. In Photosynthesis and the Environment. Ed. N.R. Barber. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 321-346.
15. Ridolfi, M., M.L. Fauveau, P. Label, J.P. Garrec and E. Dreyer. 1996. Responses to water stress in an ABA-unresponsive hybrid poplar, Populus koreana × trichocarpa cv. Peace. I. Stomatal function. New Phytol. 134:445-454.
16. Roden, J.S. and R.W. Pearcy. 1993. Photosynthetic gas exchange response of poplars to steady-state and dynamic light environments. Oecologia 93:208-214.
17. Schulz, H., P. Schroder and H. Rennenberg. 1991. Role of plants in regulating the methane flux to the atmosphere. In Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Eds. T.D. Sharkey, E.A. Holland and H.A. Mooney. Academic Press, New York, pp 29-63.
18. Tang, Y-H. 1997. Natural, abiotic factors - light. In Plant Ecophysiology. Ed. M.N.V. Prasad. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 3-40.
19. Tang, Y-H., I. Washitani, T. Tsuchiya and H. Iwaki. 1988. Fluctuation of photosynthetic photon flux density within a Miscanthus sinensis canopy. Ecol. Res. 3:253-266.
20. Tang, Y-H., H. Koizumi, I. Washitani and H. Iwaki. 1993. A preliminary study on the photosynthetic induction response of Quercus serrata seedlings. J. Plant Res. 106:219-222.
21. Tang, Y-H., H. Koizumi, H. Satou and I. Washitani. 1994. Effects of light regimes on the photosynthetic carbon gain of Quercus serrata seedlings. Oecologia 100:463-469.
22. Thomas, D.S., D. Eamus and D. Bell. 1999. Optimization theory of stomatal behaviour. II. Stomatal responses of several tree species of north Australia to changes in light, soil and atmospheric water content and temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 50:393-400.
23. Tinoco-Ojanguren, C. and R.W. Pearcy. 1992. Dynamics of stomatal behavior and its role in carbon gain during lightflecks of a gap phase and an understory Piper species acclimated to high and low light. Oecologia 92:222-228.
24. Tinoco-Ojanguren, C. and R.W. Pearcy. 1993. Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species. II. Stomatal versus biochemical limitations during photosynthetic induction. Oecologia 94:395-402.
25. Torn, M.S. and F.S. Chapin. 1993. Environmental and biotic controls over methane flux from arctic tundra. Chemosphere 26:357-368.
26. Valladares, F. and R.W. Pearcy. 1997. Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutifolia. Plant Cell Environ. 20:25-36.
27. van den Boogaard, R., D. Alewijnse, E.J. Veneklaas and H. Lambers. 1997. Growth and water-use efficiency of 10 Triticum aestivum cultivars at different water availability in relation to allocation of biomass. Plant Cell Environ. 20:200-210.
28. von Caemmerer, S. and G.D. Farquhar. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376-387.
29. Woods, D.B. and N.C. Turner. 1971. Stomatal responses to changing light by four tree species of varying shade tolerance. New Phytol. 70:77-84.