Binaural Speech Recognition and the Stenger Effect

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 926-933

  Karsten, Sue A ^a   Turner, Christopher W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetrical; Binaural; Binaural interference; Speech recognition; Stenger effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034252977     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4304.926     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arkebauer, H. J., McCall, C., & Mencher, G. T. ( 1971). Modification of speech discrimination in patients with binaural asymmetrical hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36, 208-212.
2. Durlach, N. L, Thompson, C. L., & Colburn, H. S. (1981). Binaural interaction in impaired listeners: A review of past research. Audiology, 20, 181-211.
3. Harris, J. D. (1965). Monaural and binaural speech intelligibility and the stereophonic effect based upon temporal cues. Laryngoscope, 75, 428-446.
4. Harris, J., & Myers, C. (1971). Binaural improvement in normal and defective ears in a background of other voices. US Naval Submarine Medical Center (Rep. 677), 1-5.
5. Hawkins, D. B., & Yacullo, W. S. (1984). Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 278-286.
6. Hood, J. D., & Prasher, D. K. (1990). Effect of simulated bilateral cochlear distortion on speech discrimination in normal subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 19, 37-41.
7. Jerger, J., Silman, S., Lew, H. L., & Chmiel, R. (1993) Case studies in binaural interference: Converging evidence from behavioral and electrophysiologic measures. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 4, 122-131.
8. Koehnke, J., & Besing, J. (1997). Binaural performance in listeners with impaired hearing: Aided and unaided results. In R. H. Gilkey & T. R. Anderson (Eds.), Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments (pp. 725-751). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Libby, E. R. (1980). Binaural hearing and amplification (Vols. 1 & 2). Chicago: Zenetron.
10. Markides, A. (1977). Binaural hearing aids. New York: Academic Press.
11. McCullough, J. K. (1986). Effects of interaural spectral differences on binaural word recognition in noise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
12. Schlauch, R. S., Clement, B. R., Ries, D. T., & DiGiovanni, J. J. (1999). Masker laterality and cueing in forward-masked intensity discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(2), 822-828.
13. Stenger, P. (1907). Simulation and dissimulation of ear diseases and their identification. Deutsche Medizinsche Wochenschrift, 33, 970-973.
14. Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A "rationalized" arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455-462.
15. Taylor, G. J. (1949). An experimental study of tests for the detection of auditory malingering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 14, 119-130.
16. Thornton, A. R., & Raffin, M. J. M. (1978). Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 507-518.
17. Wallach, H., Newman, E. B., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1949). The precedence effect in sound localization. The American Journal of Psychology, 62, 315-336.