The influence of interfacial forces and duration of filing on root canal shaping

Dental Traumatology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 166-174

  Gulabivala, K ^a   Abdo, S ^a   Sherriff, M ^b   Regan, J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Canal shaping; Duration of filing; Interfacial forces

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; METRIZOIC ACID;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; FORECASTING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH ROOT; TOUCH; TRANSDUCER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; METRIZOATE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH ROOT; TOUCH; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 0034252940     PISSN: 16004469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016004166.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Stadler LE, Wennberg A, Olgart L. Instrumentation of curved root canal using filing or reaming technique - a clinical study of technical complications. Swed Dent J 1986;10:37-43
2. Greene KJ, Krell KV. Clinical factors associated with ledged canals in maxillary and mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1990;70:490-7.
3. Smith GS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy - a five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J 1993;26:321-33.
4. Pettiette MT, Metzger Z, Phillips C, Trope M. Endodontic complications of root canal therapy performed by dental students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod 1999;25:330-4.
5. Gulabivala K. Preparation of the root canal. In: Stock CJR, Gulabivala K, Walker RT, Goodman JR, editors. Color Atlas and Text of Endodontics. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995. p. 110.
6. Buchanan S. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. Pathways of the pulp. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 172-177.
7. Rustage KJ, Rothwell PS, Brook IM. Evaluation of a dedicated dental procedure glove for clinical dentistry. Brit Dent J 1987;163:193-5.
8. Graham KS and Deary IJ. A role for aptitude testing in surgery? J Royal Coll Surg Edinb 1991;36:70-4.
9. Regan JD, Sherrif M, Meredith N, Gulabivala K. A survey of interfacial forces used during filing of root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol In press, 2000.
10. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparation in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1971;32:271-5.
11. Tang MPF, Stock CJR. An in vitro method for comparing the effects of different root canal preparation techniques on the shape of curved root canals. Int Endod J 1989;22:49-54.
12. Stenman E, Spangberg LSW. Root canal instruments are poorly standardised. J Endod 1993;19:327-34.