Development of an opto-electronic positioning device for serial direct digital images of oral structures

Journal of Periodontal Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 225-231

  Morea, C ^a   Langlotz, F ^b   Scheer, C ^b   Burgin W ^a   Nolte, L P ^b   Lang, N P ^a   Brägger, Urs ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b ME Muller Inst for Biomech   (Switzerland)

^c School Dental Service   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Direct digital radiography; Radiography; Subtraction radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INSTRUMENTATION; MOUTH; OPTICS; ORAL SURGERY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MOUTH; OPTICS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SURGERY, ORAL; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0034251710     PISSN: 00223484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2000.035004225.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Sewerin I. Annual number of intraoral radiographs in Denmark and other countries. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986;14:123-125.
2. Eliasson S, Wouters F, Oestin L. Quality of intraoral radiographs sent by private dental practitioners for therapy evaluation by the Social Insurance Office. Swedish Dent J 1990;14:81-89.
3. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentiomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:3-11.
4. Revesz G, Kundel H, Graber M. The influence of structured noise on the detection of radiologic abnormalities. Invest Rad 1974;9:97-99.
5. Kornman KS. Nature of periodontal diseases: assessment and diagnosis. J Periodont Res 1987;22:192-204.
6. Brägger U. Digital imaging in periodontal radiography. A review. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:551-557.
7. Ziedses des Plantes BG. Subtraction. Eine roentgenographische Methode zur separaten Abbildung bestimmter Teile des Objekts. Fortschri Roentgenstrahlen 1935;52:69-79.
8. Janssen PTM, van Aken J. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:323-330.
9. Janssen PTM, van Palenstein-Helderman W, van Aken J. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:335-341.
10. Stassinakis A, Brägger U, Stojanovic M, Bürgin W, Lussi A, Lang NP. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;244:232-237.
11. Duckworth JE, Judy PF, Goodson JM. A method for geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs. J Periodontol 1983;54:435-440.
12. Pitts N. Filmholding, beam-aiming and collimating devices as an aid to standardization in intra-oral radiography. J Dent 1984;12:36-46.
13. Jeffcoat MK, Webber RL, Williams RC, Rüttiman UE. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodont Res 1987;22:396-402.
14. Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, Aken JV. In vivo determination of radiographic projection error produced by a novel film holder and a X-ray beam manipulator. J Periodontol 1991;62:674.
15. Burdea G, Dunn SM, Immendorf CH, Mallik M. Real-time sensing of tooth position for dental digital subtraction radiography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;384:366-378.
16. Webber RL, Rüttimann U, Grönhuis R. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs. J Dent Res 1984;63:1032-1036.
17. Wenzel A. Effect of manual compared with reference points superimposition in image quality in digital subtraction radiography. Dentiomaxillofac Radiol 1989;18:145-150.
18. Webber RL, Rüttiman U, Heaven T. Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography. J Periodont Res 1990; 25:268-275.
19. Aagaard E, Donslud C, Wenzel A, Sewerin I. Performance for obtaining maximal gain from a program for digital subtraction radiography. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99: 166-172.
20. Lehmann T, Goerke C, Schmitt W, Kampp A, Repges R. A rotation-extended cepstrum technique optimized by systematic analysis of various sets of X-ray images. Proc SPIE 1996;2710:450-466.
21. Zamorano L, Nolte LP, Kadi AM, Jiang Z. Interactive intraoperative localization using an infrared-based system. Neural Res 1993;15:290-298.
22. Nelvig P, Wing K, Welarder V. Sens-A-Ray®: a new system for direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:818-823.
23. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte LP. Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg 1999;4:65-76.
24. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Mäkitalo K, Tallroth K, Nolte LP, Visarius H. Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. Spine 1997;22: 1254-1258.
25. Langlotz F, Bächler R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP, Ganz R. Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies. Clin Orthop 1998;354:92-102.
26. Zamorano L, Matter A, Saenz A, Buciuc R, Diaz F. Interactive image-guided resection of cerebral cavernous malformations. Comput Aided Surg 1997;2:327-332.
27. Lavallée S. Registration for computer-integrated surgery: methodology, state of the art. In: Taylor RH, Lavallée S, Burdea GC, Mösges R, eds. Computer-Integrated Surgery. Cambridge, London: MIT Press, 1996;77-97.
28. Benz C, Mouyen F, Sonnabend E. Intraorale Zahnaufnahme ohne Film - Das RadioVisioGraphie-System. Photomedizin 1989;2:159-162.
29. Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnabend E, Lodter J. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:238-242.
30. Horner K, Schearer A, Walker A, Wilsin N. Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation. Br Dent J 1990;168: 244-248.
31. Benz C, Mouyen F. Evaluation of the new RadioVisio-Graphy system image quality. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:627-631.
32. Stassinakis A, Stojanovic M, Bürgin W, Fourmousis I, Lang NP, Brägger U. Image processing for enhancement of RadioVisioGraphy (RVG). J Dent Res 1993;72:255.
33. Zappa U. Time-related changes of in vivo projection errors in standardized radiographs. J Periodontol 1993;64:278-284.
34. Thistle GS, Russell KA, Chaitor DV, Russell LT. Validating an uncoupled laser-aiming device for serial implant radiography. J Oral Implant 1997;23:12-20.
35. Hausmann E, Kutlubay ME, Odrobina D et al. Studies on the angular reproducibility of positioning patients adjacent to an X-ray tube 2. A new electronically guided, force-sensitive sensor-based alignment system. J Periodont Res 1995;30:294-297.
36. Hausmann E, Allen K, Loza J, Buchanan W, Cavanaugh Jr PF. Validation of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using the electronically guided alignment device/ impression technique. J Periodontol 1996;67:895-899.
37. Levy G, Burdea G, Dunn SM, Goratkowski R. Robotic control for dental subtraction radiography. First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. Pittsburg: Penn, 1994.
38. Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H, Webber RL. Influence of variation of projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions: a comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:411-420.