Computer model for fatigue crack growth from rough surfaces

International Journal of Fatigue

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 619-630

  Andrews, Scott ^a   Sehitoglu, Huseyin ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRACK PROPAGATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MILLING (MACHINING); STEEL TESTING; STRESS ANALYSIS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

ASPERITY; CRACK CLOSURE EFFECTS;

FATIGUE TESTING;

EID: 0034250798     PISSN: 01421123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00018-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Moore HF, Kommers JB. An investigation of the fatigue of metals. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 1921;124.
2. Thomas W.N. Effect of scratches and of various workshop finishes upon the fatigue strength of steel. Engng. 116:1923;449-485.
3. Lipson C., Juvinall R.C. Handbook of stress and strength. 1963;Macmillan Company, New York.
4. Noll G.C., Erickson G.C. Allowable stresses for steel members of finite life. Proc. Soc. Exp. Stress Analy. 5(2):1948;132-143.
5. Siebel E, Gaier M. Influence of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of steels and non-ferrous alloys. Engineers Digest 1957;18:109-112. (Translation from VDI Zeitschrift 1956;98(30):1715-1723).
6. Siebel E, Gaier M. Influence of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of steels and non-ferrous alloys. Engineers Digest 1957;18:109-112. (Translation from VDI Zeitschrift 1956;98(30):1715-1723).
7. Maiya P.S., Busch D.E. Effect of surface roughness on low-cycle fatigue behavior of type 304 stainless steel. Metallurgical Trans. A. 6:1975;1761-1774.
8. Wareing J., Vaughan H.G. Influence of surface finish on low-cycle fatigue characteristics of type 316 stainless steel at 400°C. Metal Sci. 13:1979;1-7.
9. Starkey M.S., Irving P.E. A comparison of the fatigue strength of machined and as-cast surfaces of SG iron. Int. J. Fatigue. 4:1982;17-24.
10. Wood D.S., Wynn J., Baldwin A.B., O'Riordan P. Some creep/fatigue properties of type 316 steel at 625°C. Fatigue Engng. Mat. Struct. 3:1980;39-57.
11. Güngör S., Edwards L. Effect of surface texture on the initiation and propagation of small fatigue cracks in a forged 6082 aluminum alloy. Mat. Sci. Engng. A: Struct. Mat.: Properties, Microstructure and Processing. 160A:1993;17-24.
12. Lee J.M., Nam S.W. Effect of crack initiation mode on low cycle fatigue life of type 304 stainless steel with surface roughness. Mat. Lett. 10:1990;223-230.
13. Fluck P.G. The influence of surface roughness on the fatigue life and scatter of test results of two steels. Proc. Am. Soc. Testing Mat. 51:1951;584-592.
14. Sehitoglu H., Gall K., García A. Recent advances in fatigue crack growth modeling. Int. J. Fract. 80:1996;165-192.
15. Sun W. Finite element simulations of fatigue crack growth and closure. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1991.
16. Peterson R.E. Stress concentration factors. 1974;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
17. Press W., Teukolsky S., Vetterling W., Flannery B. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Tada H., Paris P., Irwin G. The stress analysis of cracks handbook. 2nd ed:1985;Del Research Corporation, St. Louis.
19. McEvily A.J. On the quantitative analysis on fatigue crack propagation. Lankford J., Davidson D.L., Morris W.L., Wei R.P. Fatigue mechanisms: advances in quantitative measurement of physical damage, ASTM STP 881. 1983;283-312 American Society for Testing and Materials.
20. McGreevy T. The competing roles of microstructure and flaw size on the fatigue limit of metals. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1998.
21. Ritchie RO. Near-threshold fatigue crack propagation in ultra-high strength steel: influence of load ratio and cyclic strength. J Engng Mat Tech 1977;195-204.