Towards focused plan monitoring: A technique and an application to mobile robots

Autonomous Robots

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 71-81

  McCarthy, Colleen E ^a   Pollack, Martha E ^b  

^a Learning Research and Development Ctr   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MOTION PLANNING; ROBOTICS;

RATIONAL-BASED MONITORING; ROBOTIC OFFICE ASSISTANTS;

MOBILE ROBOTS;

EID: 0034248883     PISSN: 09295593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008980403252     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arkin, R.C. 1998. Behavior-Based Robotics, MIT Press.
2. Blum, A.L. and Furst, M.L. 1997. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence, 90:281-300.
3. Fikes, R.E., Hart, P.E., and Nilsson, N.J. 1972. Learning and executing generalized robot plans. Artificial Intelligence, 3(4):251-288.
4. Firby, R.J. 1994. Task networks for controlling continuous processes: Issues in reactive planning. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI Planning Systems, Chicago, IL, pp. 49-54.
5. Gat, E. 1992. Integrating planning and reacting in a heterogeneous asynchronous architecture for controlling real-world mobile robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, pp. 802-815.
6. Georgeff, M.P. and Ingrand, F.F. 1989. Decision-making in an embedded reasoning system. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, MI, pp. 972-978.
7. Gerevini, A. and Schubert, L. 1996. Accelerating partial-order planners: Some techniques for effective search control and pruning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 5:95-137.
8. Greenwald, L. and Dean, T. 1994. Solving time-critical decision-making problems with predictable computational demands. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI Planning Systems, Chicago, IL, pp. 25-30.
9. Kautz, H. and Selman, B. 1998. The role of domain-specific knowledge in the planning as satisfiability framework. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 181-189.
10. Long, D. and Fox, M. 1998. Efficient Implementation of the plan graph in (STAN). Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10:87-115.
11. Mali, A.D. and Kambhampati, S. 1998. Encoding HTN planning in prepositional logic. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 190-198.
12. Memon, A., Pollack, M.E., and Soffa, M.L. 1999. A comparison of causal-link and propositional planners: Tradeoffs between plan length and domain size. University of Pittsburgh Department of Computer Science Technical Report TR 99-06, Pittsburgh, PA.
13. Penberthy, J.S. and Weld, D. 1992. UCPOP: A sound, complete, partial order planner for ADL. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Cambridge, MA, pp. 103-114.
14. Pollack, M.E., Joslin, D., and Paolucci, M. 1997. Flaw selection strategies for partial-order planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 6:223-262.
15. Veloso, M.M., Carbonell, J.G., and Pérez, M.A. 1995. Integrating planning and learning: The prodigy architecture. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 7:81-120.
16. Veloso, M.M., Pollack, M.E., and Cox, M.T. 1998. Rationale-based monitoring for planning in dynamic environments. In Proceedings for the Fourth International Conference on AI Planning Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 171-179.