Performance analysis of the DCT-LMS adaptive filtering algorithm

Signal Processing

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1629-1654

  Kim, Dai I ^a   Wilde, P De ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE FILTERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION THEORY; COSINE TRANSFORMS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ADAPTIVE FILTERING ALGORITHM; CHANNEL EQUALISATION; DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORM LEAST MEAN SQUARES; EIGENVALUE SPREAD RATIO; WEIGHT ERROR VECTOR;

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS;

EID: 0034247336     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1684(00)00098-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aboulnasr T., Mayyas K. A robust variable step-size LMS-type algorithm: analysis and simulations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45(3):March 1997;631-639.
2. Ahmed N., Natarajan T., Rao K.R. Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Trans. Comput. 23:1974;90-93.
3. Beaufays F. Transform-domain adaptive filters: an analytical approach. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 43(2):February 1995;422-431.
4. Bershad N.J., Chang Y.H. Time correlation statistics of the LMS adaptive algorithm weights. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 33(1):February 1985;309-312.
5. B.M. Budak, S.V. Fomin, Multiple Integrals, Field Theory and Series, Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1973, pp. 98-103.
6. Clarke R.J. Relation between the Karhunen-Loève and cosine transforms. IEE Proc., Part F. 128(6):November 1981;359-360.
7. Evans J.B., Xue P., Liu B. Analysis and implementation of variable stepsize adaptive algorithms. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 41(8):August 1993;2517-2535.
8. Farhang-Boroujeny B. Adaptive Filters: Theory and Application. 1999;Wiley, New York.
9. Farhang Boroujeny B., Gazor S. Selection of orthonormal transforms for improving the performance of the transform domain normalised LMS algorithm. IEE Processings-F. 139(5):October 1992;327-335.
10. Feuer A., Weinstein E. Convergence analysis of LMS filters with uncorrelated Gaussian data. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 33(1):February 1985;222-230.
11. Florian S., Bershad N.J. A weighted normalized frequency domain LMS adaptive algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 36(7):July 1988;1002-1007.
12. R.M. Gray, Toeplitz and circulant matrices: a review, http: // www-isl.stanford.edu/gray/toeplitz.pdf, Stanford University, January 1997.
13. Harris R.W., Chabries D.M. A variable step (VS) adaptive filter algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 34(2):April 1986;309-316.
14. Haykin S. Adaptive Filter Theory. 2nd Edition:1991;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
15. Horowitz L.L., Senne K.D. Performance advantage of complex LMS for controlling narrow-band adaptive arrays. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 29(3):June 1981;722-736.
16. M.G. Kendall, A. Stuart, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, 3rd Edition, Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd., 1969, pp. 246-248.
17. Kwong C.P., Johnston E.W. A variable stepsize LMS algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40(7):July 1992;1633-1642.
18. Marshall D.F., Jenkins W.K., Murphy J.J. The orthogonal transforms for improving performance of adaptive filter. IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems. 36(4):April 1989;474-484.
19. Narayan S.S., Peterson A.M., Narasimha M.J. Transform domain LMS algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 31(3):June 1983;609-615.
20. Ozeki K., Umeda T. An adaptive filtering algorithm using orthogonal projection to an affine subspace and its properties. Electron. Commun. Japan. 67-A(5):1984;19-27.
21. Parikh V.N., Naraniecki A.Z. The use of the modified escalator algorithm to improve the performance of transform LMS adaptive filter. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 46(3):1998;625-635.
22. Rupp M. A family of adaptive filter algorithms with decorrelation properties. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 6(3):March 1998;771-775.
23. Samson C.G., Reddy V.U. Fixed point error analysis of the normalised ladder algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 5:October 1983;1177-1191.
24. Slock D.T. On the convergence behavior of the LMS and the normalized LMS algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41(9):September 1993;2811-2825.
25. Tarrab M., Feuer A. Convergence and performance analysis of the normalized LMS algorithm with uncorrelated Gaussian data. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 34(4):July 1988;680-691.
26. Widrow B., McCool J.M.et al. Stationary and nonstationary learning characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter. Proc. IEEE. 64(8):August 1976;1151-1162.