Two-dimensional generalized likelihood ratio test for land mine and small unexploded ordnance detection

Signal Processing

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1669-1686

  Gao, Ping ^a   Collins, Leslie M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY; FREQUENCIES; MINES; ORDNANCE; PROBABILITY; SENSOR DATA FUSION; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

DETECTION THEORY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; LAND MINE DETECTION; UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE DETECTION;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0034247261     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1684(00)00100-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. I. V. Basawa, Unilateral Markov random fields for minefield modeling and detection, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3079, Orlando, FL, April 1997.
2. C. E. Baum, Low-frequency near-field magnetic scattering from highly, but not perfectly, conducting bodies, Phillips Laboratory Interaction Note 499, November 1993.
3. Collins L.M., Gao P., Carin L. An improved bayesian decision theoretic approach for land mine detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing. 37(2):March 1998;811-819.
4. Das Y., McFee J.E. Analysis of an electromagnetic induction detector for real-time location of buried objects. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing. 28:May 1990;278-288.
5. Das Y., McFee J.E., Cherry R.H. Time-domain response of a sphere in the field of a coil: theory and experiment. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing. 22:July 1984;360-367.
6. Fieller E.C. The Distribution of the Index in a Normal Bivariate Population. Biometrika. 24:1932;428-440.
7. P. Gao, Improved approaches to land mine remediation using signal detection and estimation theory, Master's Thesis, Duke University, December, 1997.
8. P. Gao, L.M. Collins, A theoretical performance analysis and simulation time-domain EMI data for landmine detection, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing in press.
9. P. Gao, L.M. Collins, Improved signal processing approaches for landmine detection, Proceedings of SPIE, Orlando, FL, April 1998.
10. E. Gelenbe, T. Kocak, Area-based results for mine detection, IEES Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, in press.
11. Geng N., Baum C.E., Carin L. On the low-frequency natural response of conducting and permeable targets. IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sensing. 37(1):January 1999;347-359.
12. N. Geng, P. Garber, L. Collins, L. Carin, D. Hansen, D. Keiswetter, I.J. Won, Wideband electromagnetic induction for metal-target identification: theory, measurement and signal processing, Duke University Technical Report, 1998.
13. V. George, T. Altshuler, A. Andrew, J. Nicoll, E. Cespedes, D. Butler, T. Broach, R. Mehta, Background data collection plan, DARPA/Defense Science Office, December 1996.
14. Hinkley D.V. On the Ratio of two correlated normal random variables. Biometrika. 56:1969;635-639.
15. N.L. Johnson, S. Kotz, N. Balakrishnan, Continuous Univariate Distributions, 2nd Edition Vol.2, Wiley, New York, p. 433 (Chapter 29).
16. T.E. Olson and C.E. Priebe, Detection and classification of mines via discriminant features and borrowed strength, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3079, Orlando, FL, April 1997.
17. C.E. Priebe, Exploiting stochastic partitions for minefield detection, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3079, Orlando, FL, April 1997.
18. L.L. Scharf, Statistical signal processing: detection, estimation, and time series analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991, pp. 140-149 (Chapter 4).
19. G.D. Sower, S.P. Cave, Detection and identification of mines from natural magnetic and electromagnetic resonances, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 2496, Orlando, FL, April 1995.
20. H.L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Wiley, New York, 1968, pp. 19-116, 246-373 (Chapters 2,4).
21. A.D. Whalen, Detection of Signals in Noise, Academic Press, New York, 1971, p. 352.