FISH 3: A microworld for studying social dilemmas and resource management

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 417-422

  Gifford, Jonas ^a   Gifford, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FISH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; SEA; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SOCIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FISHES; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OCEANS AND SEAS; SOCIAL PROBLEMS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 0034243001     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03200810     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CASS, R. C., & EDNEY, J. J. (1978). The commons dilemma: A simulation testing the effects of resource visibility and territorial division. Human Ecology, 6, 371-386.
2. CHAPMAN, J., HU, L.-T., & MULLEN, B. (1986). GROUP1 and GROUP2: BASIC programs for laboratory research on the commons dilemma and group persuasion. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 18, 466-467.
3. DAWES, R. M. (1973). The commons dilemma game: An n-person mixed-motive game with a dominating strategy for defection. ORI Research Bulletin, 13, 1-12.
4. DAWES, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
5. DIFONZO, N., HANTULA, D. A., & BORDIA, P. (1998). Microworlds for experimental research: Having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 30, 278-286.
6. EDNEY, J. J. (1979). The nuts game: A concise commons dilemma analog. Environmental Psychology & Nonverbal Behavior, 3, 252-254.
7. GARDNER, R., OSTROM, E., & WALKER, J. (1990). The nature of common-pool resource problems. Rationality & Society, 2, 335-358.
8. GIFFORD, R. (1997). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. GIFFORD, R., & HINE, D. W. (1997a). "I'm cooperative, but you're greedy": Some cognitive tendencies in a commons dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 257-265.
10. GIFFORD, R., & HINE, D. W. (1997b). Toward cooperation in commons dilemmas. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 167-179.
11. GIFFORD, R., & WELLS, J. (1991). FISH: A commons dilemma simulation. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 23, 437-441.
12. HARDIN, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
13. HINE, D. W., & GIFFORD, R. (1996a). Attributions about self and others in commons dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 429-445.
14. HINE, D. W., & GIFFORD, R. (1996b). Individual restraint and group efficiency in commons dilemmas: The effects of uncertainty and risk-seeking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 993-1009.
15. HINE, D. W., & GIFFORD, R. (1997). What harvesters really think about in commons dilemma simulations: A grounded theory analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 179-193.
16. KOMORITA, S. S., & PARKS, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
17. LIEBRAND, W., MESSICK, D., & WILKE, H. (1992). Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. LLOYD, W. F. (1968). Lectures on population, value, poor laws and rent. New York: August M. Kelley. (Original work published 1837)
19. PARKER, R., LUI, L., MESSICK, C., MESSICK, D. M., BREWER, M. B., KRAMER, R., SAMUELSON, C., & WILKE, H. (1983). A computer laboratory for studying resource dilemmas. Behavioral Science, 28, 298-304.
20. PLATT, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641-651.