|
|
Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 261-266
|
|
A response to Hovers, Kimbel and Rak's argument for the purposeful burial of Amud 7.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANIMAL;
EVOLUTION;
HOMINID;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
NOTE;
POSTHUMOUS CARE;
ANIMALS;
BURIAL;
EVOLUTION;
HOMINIDAE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
|
|
EID: 0034242588
PISSN: 00472484
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0419 Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (12)
|
|
References (0)
|
