Response amendment in fencing: Differences between elite and novice subjects

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 131-142

  Williams, L R T ^a   Walmsley, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEG; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCLE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SPORT;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARM; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LEG; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLES; REACTION TIME; SPORTS;

EID: 0034242239     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.131     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. ASYST SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (1991) Asyst 3.10. [Computer software] Rochester, NY: Author.
2. DIXON, W. J. (1990) BMDP statistical software manual. Berkeley, CA: Univer. of California Press.
3. HARMENBERG, J., CECI, R., BARVESTAD, P., HJERPE, K., & NYSTRÖM, J. (1991) Comparison of different tests of fencing performance. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 12, 573-576.
4. KLINGER, A. K., & ADRIAN, M. J. (1983) Foil target impact forces during the fencing lunge. In H. Matsui & K. Kobayashi (Eds.), Biomechanics VIIIB: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Biomechanics, Nagoya, Japan. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 882-888.
5. SZILAGYI, T. (1993) Dynamic characterisation of fencing lunge. Paper presented at the International Society of Biomechanics XIVth Congress, Paris, July.
6. WILLIAMS, L. R. T. (1975) Effects of complexity on movement refractoriness. Research Quarterly, 46, 177-183.
7. WILLIAMS, L. R. T., & WALMSLEY, A. (in press) Response timing and muscular coordination in fencing: a comparison of elite and novice fencers. The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.