Effects of subphonetic and syllable structure variation on word recognition

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1297-1311

  Utman, Jennifer Aydelott ^a,b   Blumstein, Sheila E ^a   Burton, Martha W ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; RANDOMIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; HUMANS; PHONETICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0034241003     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212131     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANDRUSKI, J. E., BLUMSTEIN, S. E., & BURTON, M. W. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52, 163-187.
2. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 299-320.
3. BURTON, M. W. (1989). Associated, mediated, and rhyme priming: A study of lexical processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University. .
4. CHURCH, K. W. (1987). Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval. Cognition, 25, 53-69.
5. DALBY, J. (1985). Phonetic structure of fast speech in American English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
6. FRANCIS, W. N., & KUČERA, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. FRAUENFELDER, U., & LAHIRI, A. (1989). Understanding words and word recognition. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 319-341). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. FRAZIER, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition. Cognition, 25, 157-187.
9. GASKELL, M. G., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 144-158.
10. KESSINGER, R. H., & BLUMSTEIN, S. E. (1997). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 143-168.
11. KLATT, D. H. (1975). Voice onset time, friction, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 18, 686-706.
12. KLATT, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279-312.
13. KLATT, D. H. (1986). The problem of variability in speech recognition and in models of speech perception. In J. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. KNAPP, A. G., & ANDERSON, J. A. (1984). Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 616-637.
15. LAHIRI, A., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245-294.
16. LASS, R. (1984). Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1993). Issues of process and representation in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of language processes: The Second Sperlonga Meeting (pp. 187-210). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
18. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., MOSS, H. E., & VAN HALEN, S. (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1376-1392.
19. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & WARREN, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
20. MILLER, J. L., GREEN, K., & REEVES, A. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43, 106-115.
21. POSNER, M. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
22. SLOWIACZEK, L. M., & PISONI, D. B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 14, 230-237.
23. STREETER, L. A., & NIGRO, G. N. (1979). The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1533-1541.
24. UTMAN, J. A. (1997). Effects of subphonetic acoustic differences on lexical access in neurologically intact adults and patients with Broca's aphasia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.
25. UTMAN, J. A. (1998a). Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice-onset time in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1640-1653.
26. UTMAN, J. A. (1998b). The role of phonetic exemplars in the mapping from sound to meaning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27. UTMAN, J. A., BLUMSTEIN, S. E., & SULLIVAN, K. (1998, April). Mapping from sound to meaning: Reduced lexical activation in Broca's aphasics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
28. VOLAITIS, L., & MILLER, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723-735.
29. WHALEN, D. H. (1991). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 351-360.