Differences in immediacy between traditional and nontraditional students

Psychological Reports

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 323-324

  Prisbell, Marshall ^a   Hilt, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENTS;

EID: 0034240903     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.1.323     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. CHARTRAND, J. M. (1992) An empirical test of a model of nontraditional student adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 193-202.
2. GORHAM, J. S. (1988) The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
3. MEHRABIAN, A. (1971) Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4. MOTTET, T. P., & RICHMOND, V. P. (1998) An inductive analysis of verbal immediacy: alternative conceptualization of relational verbal approach/avoidance strategies. Communication Quarterly, 46(1), 25-40.
5. RICHMOND, V. P., GORHAM, J. S., & MCCROSKEY, J. C. (1987) The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed), Communication yearbook 10. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 574-590.
6. ROCCA, K. A., & MCCROSKEY, J. C. (1999) The interrelationship of student ratings of instructors' immediacy, verbal aggressiveness, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Communication Education, 48, 308-316.