External and internal influences on institutional approaches to student assessment: Accountability or improvement?

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 443-479

  Peterson, Marvin W ^a   Augustine, Catherine H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034239288     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007080408692     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aper, J. P. (1993). Higher education and the state: Accountability and the roots of student outcomes assessment. Higher Education Management 5: 365-376.
2. Aper, J. P., Cuver, S. M., and Hinkle, D. E. (1990). Coming to terms with the accountability versus improvement debate in assessment. Higher Education 20: 471-483.
3. Banta, T. W. (1993). Summary and conclusion: Are we making a difference? In T. W. Banta and Associates (Eds.), Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 357-376. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Banta, T. W., and Associates (Eds.). (1993). Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K. E., and Oblander, F. W. (Eds.). (1996). Assessment in Practice; Putting Principles to Work on College Campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Braskamp, L. A. (1991). Purposes, issues, and principles of assessment. NCA Quarterly 66 (2): 417-429.
7. Cole, J. J. K., Nettles, M. T., and Sharp, S. (1997). Assessment of Teaching and Learning for Improvement and Accountability: State Governing, Coordinating Board and Regional Accreditation Association Policies and Practices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
8. El-Khawas, E. (1995). Campus Trends 1995. Higher Education Panel Report No. 85. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
9. Ewell, P. T. (1987a). Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement: Managing the Contradiction. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
10. Ewell, P. T. (1987b). Assessment: Where are we? The implications of new state mandates. Change 19(1): 23-28.
11. Ewell, P. T. (1988). Outcomes, assessment, and academic improvement: In search of usable knowledge. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. IV, pp. 53-108. New York: Agathon Press.
12. Ewell, P. T. (1993). The role of states and accreditors in shaping assessment practice. In T. W. Banta (Ed.), Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 339-356. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Ewell, P. T. (1997). Strengthening assessment for academic quality improvement. In M. W. Peterson, D. D. Dill, L. A. Mets, and Associates (Eds.), Planning and Management for a Changing Environment: A Handbook on Redesigning Postsecondary Institutions, pp. 360-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Ewell, P. T., and Boyer, C. M. (1988). Acting out state-mandated assessment: Evidence from five states Change 20(4): 40-47.
15. Gentemann, K. M., and Rogers, B. H. (1987). The evaluation of institutional effectiveness: The responses of colleges and universities to regional accreditation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Association for Institutional Research and the Society for College and University Planning, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 290 392).
16. Gill, W. E. (1993, June). Conversations about accreditation: Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools. Focusing on outcomes assessment in the accreditation process. Paper presented at the Double Feature Conference on Assessment and Continuous Quality Improvement of the American Association for Higher Education, Chicago, IL (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 792).
17. Halpern, D. F. (1987). (Ed.). Student Outcomes Assessment: What Institutions Stand to Gain (New Directions for Higher Education No. 59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Hexter, H., and Lippincott, J. K. (1990). Campuses and Student Assessment (Research Briefs, Vol. 1, No. 8). Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Division of Policy Analysis and Research.
19. Hines, E. R. (1988). Higher Education and State Governments: Renewed Partnership, Cooperation, or Competition? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
20. Jacobi, M., Astin, A., and Ayala, F. (1987). College Student Outcomes Assessment: A Talent Development Perspective. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
21. Jones, D. P., and Ewell, P. (1993). The Effect of State Policy on Undergraduate Education: State Policy and College Learning. Boulder, CO: Education Commission of the State.
22. Kerschner, L. (1987). Outcomes assessment in the California master plan. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Student Outcomes Assessment: What Institutions Stand to Gain (New Directions for Higher Education No. 59, pp. 29-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Loacker, G., and Mentkowski, M. (1993). Creating a culture where assessment improves learning. In T. W., Banta and Associates (Eds.), Making a Difference: Outcomes of a Decade of Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 5-24. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. McGuinness, A. C., Jr. (1994). A Framework for Evaluating State Policy Roles in Improving Undergraduate Education: Stimulating Long-Term Systemic Change. Boulder, CO: Education Commission of the States.
25. McGuinness, A. C., Jr., Epper, R. M., and Arredondo, S. (1994). State Postsecondary Education Structures Handbook, 1994. State Coordinating and Governing Boards: Profiles, Roles and Responsibilities, Membership, Staffing. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States Distribution Center (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 787).
26. Muffo, J. A. (1992). The status of student outcomes assessment at NASULGC member institutions. Research in Higher Education 33: 765-74.
27. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. (1996). The National Assessment of College Student Learning: An Inventory of State-Level Assessment Activities. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
28. Nettles, M. T. (1987). The Emergence of College Outcome Assessments: Prospects for Enhancing State Colleges and Universities. Trenton: New Jersey State Colleges Governing Boards Association, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295-505).
29. Nichols, J. O. (1990). The role of institutional research in implementing institutional effectiveness or outcomes assessment. AIR Professional File\R, 37: 1-6.
30. Peterson, M. W., Einarson, M. K., Augustine, C. H., and Vaughan, D. S. (1999). Institutional Support for Student Assessment: Methodology and Results of a National Survey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
31. Peterson, M. W., Einarson, M. K., Trice, A. G., and Nichols, A. R. (1997). Improving Organizational and Administrative Support for Student Assessment: A Review of Research Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
32. Rossman, J. E., and El-Khawas, E. (1987). Thinking About Assessment: Perspectives for Presidents and Chief Academic Officers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education and the American Association for Higher Education.
33. Sims, S. J. (1992). Student Outcomes Assessment: A Historical Review and Guide to Program Development, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
34. Steele, J. M., and Lutz, D. A. (1995). Report of ACT's Research on Postsecondary Assessment Needs. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
35. Wade, M. G. (1989). An analysis of the impact of the instructional evaluation program on the public universities in Tennessee. (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International 49: 1678.
36. Winston, R. B., Jr., and Miller, T. K. (1994). A model for assessing developmental outcomes related to student affairs programs and services. NASPA Journal 32(1): 2-19.