Pseudo-dynamic testing with substructuring at the ELSA laboratory

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 905-925

  Pegon, P ^a   Pinto, A V ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Asynchronous input motions; Bridge testing; Pseudo dynamic testing method; Seismic testing; Substructuring; operator splitting time integration method

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; INTEGRATION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TEST FACILITIES;

ASYNCHRONOUS INPUT MOTION; BRIDGE TESTING; PSEUDO DYNAMIC TESTING; REACTION WALL FACILITY; SEISMIC TESTING; SUBSTRUCTURING; TIME INTEGRATION METHOD;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 0034235376     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7<905::AID-EQE941>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Takanashi K, Udagawa K, Seki M, Okada T, Tanaka H. Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer-actuator on-line system. Bulletin of Earthquake Resistant Structure Research Centre No. 8, Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, Japan, 1975.
2. Donea J, Jones PM, Magonette GE, Verzeletti G. The pseudo-dynamic test method. In Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Davidovici VE (ed.). Ouest Editions, Nantes, France, 1992; 769-780.
3. Dermitzakis SN, Mahin SA. Development of substructuring techniques for on-line computer controlled seismic performance testing. Report No. UCB/EERC-85/04, Berkeley, USA, 1985.
4. Magonette G. Digital control of pseudodynamic tests. In Experimental and Numerical Methods in Earthquake Engineering, Donea J, Jones PM (eds). Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991; 63-99.
5. Magonette G. The digital control of pseudodynamic tests. In Experimental Methods in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Mazars J, Booth E (eds). AFPS-SECED, Saint-Rémy-les-Chevreuse, France, 1993; 50-62.
6. Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Taylor RL. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1977; 5:283-292.
7. Nakashima M, Akazawa T, Sakaguchi O. Integration method capable of controlling experimental error growth in substructure pseudo dynamic test. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering AIJ 1993; 454:61-71 (in Japanese).
8. Combescure D, Pegon P. α-Operator Splitting time integration technique for pseudodynamic testing-error propagation analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1997; 16: 427-443.
9. Combescure D, Pegon P, Magonette G. Numerical investigation of the impact of experimental errors on various pseudo-dynamic integration algorithms. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Duma G. (ed.). Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1995; 2479-2484.
10. Shing B, Vannan MT, Cater E. Implicit time integration for pseudodynamic tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1991; 20:551-576.
11. Millard A. CASTEM 2000, Guide d'utilisation. Rapport CEA 93/007, Saclay, France, 1993 (in French).
12. Buchet Ph, Pegon P. PSD testing with substructuring - implementation and use. JRC Special Publication No. I.94.25, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 1994.
13. Oliveira CS, Hao H, Penzien J. Ground motion modelling for multiple-input structural analysis. Structural Safety 1991; 10:79-93.
14. Monti G, Pinto PE, Nuti C. Response of conventional and isolated bridges under non-synchronous seismic motion. European Seismic Design Practice - Research and Application, Elnashai AS (ed.). Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
15. Pegon P. Derivation of consistent proportional viscous damping matrices. JRC Special Publication No. I.96.49, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 1996.
16. Pegon P. PSD testing with substructuring: the case of asynchronous motion. JRC Special Publication No. I.96.42, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 1996.
17. Pinto PE. Research and practice on seismic design of bridges in Europe. Proceedings of the U.S. National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways, San Diego, CA, 1995.
18. Pinto AV, Calvi GM. Ongoing and future research in support of Eurocode 8. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco. Elsevier: New York.
19. Pinto AV, Verzeletti G, Pegon P, Magonette G, Negro P, Guedes J. Pseudo-dynamic testing of large-scale R/C bridges. EUR Report No. 16378 EN, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 1995.
20. Pinto AV (ed.). Pseudodynamic and shaking table tests on RC bridges. ECOEST/PREC8 Concerted Action Report N. 5S (EC-HCM), LNEC, Lisbon, 1996.
21. Guedes J, Pinto AV, Numerical simulation of the ELSA PSD tests on R/C bridges. Report EUR 16358 EN, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 1996.
22. Calvi G, Pinto PE. (eds). Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of bridges and recommendations for code provisions. ECOEST/PREC8 Concerted Action Report N. 4 (EC-HCM), LNEC, Lisbon, 1996.
23. Pinto AV, Pegon P, Costa AC. Pseudo-dynamic testing of bridges with asynchronous input motions. JRC Special Publication, JRC, Ispra, Italy, 2000.
24. Guedes J. Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete-modelling, numerical analysis and experimental assessment. PhD thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Porto, Portugal, 1997.