Influence of relative layer height and testing method on the failure mode and origin in a bilayered dental ceramic composite

Dental Materials

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 235-243

  Thompson, G A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b US Army Dental and Trauma Research Detachment   (United States)

Author keywords

Biaxial test; Ceramic; Dental materials; Failure mode; Failure origin; Flexure test; Fractography; In Ceram; Laminate; Prosthodontics

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; IN CERAM; IN-CERAM; VITADUR ALPHA OMEGA;

ADHESION; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADHESIVENESS; ALGORITHMS; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLIABILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0034230609     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00005-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:536-41.
2. Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-8.
3. Grant GT, Kelly JR. Fabrication and failure behavior of an allceramic FPD test analog. J Dent Res 1995;74:160 (abstr. no. 1185).
4. Johnson CA. Fracture statistics of multiple flaw distributions. In: Bradt RC, Evans AG, Hasselman DPH, Lange FF, editors. Fracture mechanics of ceramics, vol. 5: surface flaws, statistics, and microcracking. New York: Plenum Press, 1983. p. 365-86.
5. Holloway DG. The physical properties of glass. London: Wykeham Publications Ltd, 1973.
6. Fairhurst CW, Morena R, Lockwood P, Ringel R. A study of flaw size in procelain. J Dent Res 1994;73(370):2144.
7. Rice RW, Pohanka RC. Grain-size dependence of spontaneous cracking in ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1979;62:559-63.
8. Griffith AA. Phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans R Soc (London) 1920;A224:163-98.
9. McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Brit Dent J 1965;119(6):251-67.
10. Quinn GD, Morrell R. Design data for engineering ceramics: a review of the flexure test. J Am Ceram Soc 1991;74:2037-66.
11. Carrier DD, Kelly JR. In-Ceram failure behavior and core-veneer interface quality as influenced by residual infiltration glass. J Prosthodont 1995;4:237-42.
12. Cazzato A, Faber KT. Fracture energy of glass-alumina interfaces via the bimaterial bend test. J Am Ceram Soc 1997;80:181-8.
13. White SN, Caputo AA, Vidjak FMA, Seghi RR. Moduli of rupture of layered dental ceramics. Dent Mater 1994;10:52-8.
14. Zeng K, Odén A, Rowcliffe D. Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic materials in combination with porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:183-9.
15. Smith TB, Kelly JR, Tesk JA. In vitro fracture behavior of ceramic and metal-ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont 1994;3:138-44.
16. Hibbeler RC. Mechanics of materials. 2nd ed. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994.
17. Jung Y-G, Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR. Contact damage resistance and strength degradation of glass-infiltrated alumina and spinel ceramics. J Dent Res 1999;77(3):804-14.
18. Young WC. Roark's formulas for stress and strain. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.
19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6872: 1995(E): Dental ceramic, ed 2. Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 1995.
20. US Army Materials Technology Laboratory. 1990. Flexural strength of high performance ceramics at ambient temperature (MIL-STD-1942A). Defense Printing Service Detachment Office, Philadelphia, PA.