On a priori, blind and open comparisons between theory and experiment

Fire Safety Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 63-66

  Beard, Alan N ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

A PRIORI COMPARISON; BLIND COMPARISON; FIRE SAFETY; OPEN COMPARISON;

FIRE PROTECTION;

EID: 0034229642     PISSN: 03797112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00015-1     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Beard AN. Fire models & design. Fire Safety J 1997;28:117-138.
2. Beard AN. Evaluation of deterministic fire models: Part 1 - introduction. Fire Safety J 1992;19:295-306.
3. Beard AN. Evaluation of fire models: report 11 - overview. Unit of Fire Safety Engineering, Edinburgh University. UK. 1990. See also Reports 1-10: there is no Report 7. Available from the Fire Research & Development Group. Home Office. London.
4. Miles SD, Kumar S, Cox G. Comparisons of blind predictions of a CFD model with experimental data. Sixth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science. Poitiers, 5-9 July, 1999.
5. Webb S. Fire model evaluation. Fire & blast information group (FABIG) Newsletter, Issue 22, May 1998, pp. 21-23. Steel Construction Institute. Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, UK.
6. Alvares NJ, Foote KL, Pagni PJ. Forced ventilated enclosure fires. Combust Sci Technol 1984;39:55-81.
7. Kumar S. Field Model Simulations of Vehicle Fires in a Channel Tunnel Shuttle Wagon. Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science. Ottawa. 13-17 July 1994. pp. 995-1006.
8. Simcox S, Wilkes NS, Jones IP. Fire at King's Cross Underground Station. 18th November 1987: Numerical simulation of the buoyant flow and heat transfer. Report AERE-G 4677, UKAEA, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire, UK; 1988.
9. Cox G, Chitty R, Kumar S. Fire modelling and the King's Cross fire investigation. Fire Safety J 1989;15:103-6.