Performance analysis of hypothesis testing for sparse pairwise interaction point processes

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1357-1365

  Gubner, John A ^a,c   Chang, Wei Bin ^a   Hayat, Majeed M ^b  

^a Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

^b Philips Innovation Center   (Taiwan)

^c University of Dayton   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; RANDOM PROCESSES; SHOT NOISE; STATISTICAL METHODS;

GIBBS POINT PROCESS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; PAIRWISE INTERACTION POINT PROCESS; POISSON APPROXIMATION;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 0034228439     PISSN: 00189448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/18.850675     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. P. Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures. New York: Wiley, 1968.
2. _, Probability and Measure. New York: Wiley, 1979.
3. W.-B. Chang and J. A. Gubner, Poisson limits and nonparametric estimation for pairwise interaction point processes, J. Appl. Probab., vol. 37, no. 1, Mar. 2000, to be published.
4. N. A. C. Cressie, Statistics for Spatial Data, revised ed. New York: Wiley, 1993.
5. P. J. Diggle, D. J. Gates, and A. Stibbard, A nonparametric estimator for pairwise interaction point processes, Biometrika, vol. 74, pp. 763-770, 1987.
6. P. J. Diggle, T. Fiksel, P. Grabarnik, Y. Ogata, D. Stoyan, and M. Tanemura, On parameter estimation for pairwise interaction point processes, Int. Statist. Rev., vol. 62, pp. 99-117, 1994.
7. C. J. Geyer and J. Møller, Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scand. J. Statist., vol. 21, pp. 359-373, 1994.
8. J. A. Gubner and M. M. Hayat, A method to recover counting distributions from their characteristic functions, IEEE Signal Processing Lett., vol. 3, pp. 184-186, June 1996.
9. J. A. Gubner, Computation of shot-noise probability distributions and densities, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 750-761, May 1996.
10. J. F. C. Kingman, Poisson Processes. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon, 1993.
11. R. A. Moyeed and A. J. Baddeley, Stochastic approximation of the MLE for a spatial point pattern, Scand. J. Statist., vol. 18, pp. 39-50, 1991.
12. Y. Ogata and M. Tanemura, Estimation of interaction potentials of spatial point patterns through the maximum likelihood procedure, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., pt. B, vol. 33, pp. 315-338, 1981.
13. _, Likelihood analysis of spatial point patterns, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, vol. 46, pp. 496-518, 1984.
14. A. Penttinen, Modelling interaction in spatial point patterns: Parameter estimation by the maximum likelihood method, Jyväsklä Stud. Comput. Sci. Econ. Statist., vol. 7, pp. 1-107, 1984.
15. B. D. Ripley, Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
16. R. Saunders and G. M. Funk, Poisson limits for a clustering model of Strauss, J. Appl. Probab., vol. 14, pp. 776-784, 1977.
17. D. L. Snyder and M. I. Miller, Random Point Processes in Time and Space, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.