Phase synchronization of coupled Ginzburg-Landau equations

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 62, Issue 1 A, 2000, Pages 438-441

  Junge, Lutz ^a   Parlitz, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; CORRELATION METHODS; LYAPUNOV METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

GINZBURG-LANDAU EQUATIONS; LYAPUNOV EXPONENT; PHASE SLIPS; PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION;

PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

EID: 0034227777     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.438     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. V.S. Afraimovich, N.N. Verichev, and M.I. Rabinovich, Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 29, 1050 (1986).
2. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983); L. Pecora and T. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990); L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, ibid. 74, 5028 (1995); U. Parlitz, L. Kocarev, T. Stojanovski, and H. Preckel, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4351 (1996).
3. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983); L. Pecora and T. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990); L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, ibid. 74, 5028 (1995); U. Parlitz, L. Kocarev, T. Stojanovski, and H. Preckel, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4351 (1996).
4. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983); L. Pecora and T. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990); L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, ibid. 74, 5028 (1995); U. Parlitz, L. Kocarev, T. Stojanovski, and H. Preckel, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4351 (1996).
5. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983); L. Pecora and T. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990); L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, ibid. 74, 5028 (1995); U. Parlitz, L. Kocarev, T. Stojanovski, and H. Preckel, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4351 (1996).
6. U. Parlitz, L. Kocarev, T. Stojanovski, and L. Junge, Physica D 9, 139 (1997).
7. L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2206 (1996); L. Kocarev, Z. Tasev, and U. Parlitz, ibid. 79, 51 (1997); N. Parekh, S. Parthasarathy, and S. Sinha, ibid. 81, 1401 (1998); L. Junge, U. Parlitz, Z. Tasev, and L. Kocarev, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 2265 (2000); L. Junge and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3736 (2000).
8. L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2206 (1996); L. Kocarev, Z. Tasev, and U. Parlitz, ibid. 79, 51 (1997); N. Parekh, S. Parthasarathy, and S. Sinha, ibid. 81, 1401 (1998); L. Junge, U. Parlitz, Z. Tasev, and L. Kocarev, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 2265 (2000); L. Junge and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3736 (2000).
9. L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2206 (1996); L. Kocarev, Z. Tasev, and U. Parlitz, ibid. 79, 51 (1997); N. Parekh, S. Parthasarathy, and S. Sinha, ibid. 81, 1401 (1998); L. Junge, U. Parlitz, Z. Tasev, and L. Kocarev, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 2265 (2000); L. Junge and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3736 (2000).
10. L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2206 (1996); L. Kocarev, Z. Tasev, and U. Parlitz, ibid. 79, 51 (1997); N. Parekh, S. Parthasarathy, and S. Sinha, ibid. 81, 1401 (1998); L. Junge, U. Parlitz, Z. Tasev, and L. Kocarev, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 2265 (2000); L. Junge and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3736 (2000).
11. L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2206 (1996); L. Kocarev, Z. Tasev, and U. Parlitz, ibid. 79, 51 (1997); N. Parekh, S. Parthasarathy, and S. Sinha, ibid. 81, 1401 (1998); L. Junge, U. Parlitz, Z. Tasev, and L. Kocarev, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 9, 2265 (2000); L. Junge and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3736 (2000).
12. G. Hu and Z. Qu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 68 (1994); R.O. Grigoriev, M.C. Cross, and H.G. Schuster, ibid. 79, 2795 (1997).
13. G. Hu and Z. Qu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 68 (1994); R.O. Grigoriev, M.C. Cross, and H.G. Schuster, ibid. 79, 2795 (1997).
14. S. Boccaletti, J. Bragard, F.T. Arecchi, and H. Mancini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 536 (1999).
15. M.G. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996); U. Parlitz, L. Junge, W. Lauterborn, and L. Kocarev, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2115 (1996); G. Osipov, A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, ibid. 55, 2353 (1997); M.G. Rosenblum, A.S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4193 (1997).
16. M.G. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996); U. Parlitz, L. Junge, W. Lauterborn, and L. Kocarev, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2115 (1996); G. Osipov, A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, ibid. 55, 2353 (1997); M.G. Rosenblum, A.S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4193 (1997).
17. M.G. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996); U. Parlitz, L. Junge, W. Lauterborn, and L. Kocarev, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2115 (1996); G. Osipov, A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, ibid. 55, 2353 (1997); M.G. Rosenblum, A.S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4193 (1997).
18. M.G. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996); U. Parlitz, L. Junge, W. Lauterborn, and L. Kocarev, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2115 (1996); G. Osipov, A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, ibid. 55, 2353 (1997); M.G. Rosenblum, A.S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4193 (1997).
19. U. Parlitz and I. Wedekind, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos (to be published).
20. We can set the initial phase difference |Δφ|<π because the initial phases are only determined up to multiples of 2π.
21. P. Tass, M. Rosenblum, J. Weule, J. Kurths, A. Pikovsky, J. Volkmann, A. Schnitzler, and H.-J. Freund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3291 (1998); C. Schäfer, M.G. Rosenblum, J. Kurths, and H.-H. Abel, Nature (London) 392, 239 (1998).
22. P. Tass, M. Rosenblum, J. Weule, J. Kurths, A. Pikovsky, J. Volkmann, A. Schnitzler, and H.-J. Freund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3291 (1998); C. Schäfer, M.G. Rosenblum, J. Kurths, and H.-H. Abel, Nature (London) 392, 239 (1998).
23. M. Palus, J. Kurths, U. Schwarz, D. Movotna, and I. Charvatova, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos (to be published).
24. H. Chaté, A. Pikovsky, and O. Rudzick, Physica D 131, 17 (1999).
25. M.C. Cross and P.C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993).
26. 2 = 0; n,m ∈ N, which are the classical n:m resonances.
27. v|〉 to a constant value when varying the coupling strength c. A motivation for this measure of PS is not given in Ref. [6] and we consider it not to be suitable for verifying PS or FS.
28. This argument applies only in the noise-free case. In experiments the (usually Gaussian) noise induces phase slips and support on a proper subset of the circle is no longer possible. Therefore, with noisy data PS can only be verified in a statistical sense by observing a sharp peak in the histogram Fig. 4.
29. N. Rulkov, M. Sushchik, L. Tsimring, and H. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995); L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1816 (1996).
30. N. Rulkov, M. Sushchik, L. Tsimring, and H. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995); L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1816 (1996).
31. ⊥ < 0 is not a sufficient condition, because there may exist some transversely unstable sets that can locally destroy the functional relationship.