Dynamics of the local moment induced by nonmagnetic defects in cuprates

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1108-1111

  MacFarlane, W A ^a,d   Bobroff, J ^a   Alloul, H ^a   Mendels, P ^a   Blanchard, N ^a   Collin, G ^b   Marucco, J F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL LATTICES; LITHIUM; MAGNETIC MOMENTS; MAGNETIC RELAXATION; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUMERICAL METHODS; PROBES; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS; THERMAL EFFECTS; YTTRIUM BARIUM COPPER OXIDES;

KONDO EFFECT; KONDO STATE; MAGNETIC PERTURBATION; NONMAGNETIC DEFECTS; SPIN DYNAMICS; SPIN LATTICE RELAXATION;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0034227149     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1108     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. V. Mahajan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3100 (1994).
2. A. V. Mahajan, H. Alloul, G. Collin, and J. F. Marucco, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 457 (2000).
3. K. Ishida et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 531 (1996).
4. J. Bobroff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4381 (1999).
5. G. B. Martins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3563 (1997); K. M. Kojima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 503 (1997); F. Tedoldi, R. Santachiara, and M. Horvatic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 412 (1999); N. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 604 (1998).
6. G. B. Martins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3563 (1997); K. M. Kojima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 503 (1997); F. Tedoldi, R. Santachiara, and M. Horvatic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 412 (1999); N. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 604 (1998).
7. G. B. Martins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3563 (1997); K. M. Kojima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 503 (1997); F. Tedoldi, R. Santachiara, and M. Horvatic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 412 (1999); N. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 604 (1998).
8. G. B. Martins et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3563 (1997); K. M. Kojima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 503 (1997); F. Tedoldi, R. Santachiara, and M. Horvatic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 412 (1999); N. Fujiwara et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 604 (1998).
9. Magnetism, edited by H. Suhl (Academic Press, New York, 1973), Vol. V, and references therein.
10. P. Mendels et al., Europhys. Lett. 56, 678 (1999).
11. H. Alloul et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3140 (1991); R. E. Walstedt et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 10646 (1993); J. Bobroff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2117 (1997).
12. H. Alloul et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3140 (1991); R. E. Walstedt et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 10646 (1993); J. Bobroff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2117 (1997).
13. H. Alloul et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3140 (1991); R. E. Walstedt et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 10646 (1993); J. Bobroff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2117 (1997).
14. For example, K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
15. H. Alloul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 603 (1975); J. Phys. (Paris) 37, L205 (1976).
16. H. Alloul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 603 (1975); J. Phys. (Paris) 37, L205 (1976).
17. H. Shiba, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 967 (1975); W. Götze and P. Schlottmann, Solid State Commun. 13, 17 (1973); J. Low Temp. Phys. 16, 87 (1974).
18. H. Shiba, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 967 (1975); W. Götze and P. Schlottmann, Solid State Commun. 13, 17 (1973); J. Low Temp. Phys. 16, 87 (1974).
19. H. Shiba, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 967 (1975); W. Götze and P. Schlottmann, Solid State Commun. 13, 17 (1973); J. Low Temp. Phys. 16, 87 (1974).
20. M. Gabay, Physica (Amsterdam) 235-240C, 1337 (1996); N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3755 (1997); G. Khaliullin et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 11 882 (1997).
21. M. Gabay, Physica (Amsterdam) 235-240C, 1337 (1996); N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3755 (1997); G. Khaliullin et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 11 882 (1997).
22. M. Gabay, Physica (Amsterdam) 235-240C, 1337 (1996); N. Nagaosa and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3755 (1997); G. Khaliullin et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 11 882 (1997).
23. V. Brunel, M. Bocquet, and Th. Jolicoeur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2821 (1999); I. Affleck and S. Qin, cond-mat/9907284.
24. V. Brunel, M. Bocquet, and Th. Jolicoeur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2821 (1999); I. Affleck and S. Qin, cond-mat/9907284.
25. H. Alloul et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2494 (1997).
26. imp. Thus we include the highly overdoped Ca sample with the others.
27. A. Rigamonti, F. Borsa, and P. Carretta, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 1367 (1998); C. Berthier et al., J. Phys. (Paris) 12, 2205 (1996).
28. A. Rigamonti, F. Borsa, and P. Carretta, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 1367 (1998); C. Berthier et al., J. Phys. (Paris) 12, 2205 (1996).
29. T. Moriya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 18, 516 (1963).
30. Y. Sidis et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 6811 (1996); Y. Sidis et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 3330 (1998).
31. Y. Sidis et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 6811 (1996); Y. Sidis et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 3330 (1998).
32. The values τ are also much too short to be related to the narrow EPR lines observed in LSCO [A. M. Finkel'stein et al., JETP Lett. 51, 129 (1990); Physica (Amsterdam) 168C, 370 (1990)] which we thus conclude are unrelated to the induced moments discussed here, and likely originate in a paramagnetic impurity phase.
33. The values τ are also much too short to be related to the narrow EPR lines observed in LSCO [A. M. Finkel'stein et al., JETP Lett. 51, 129 (1990); Physica (Amsterdam) 168C, 370 (1990)] which we thus conclude are unrelated to the induced moments discussed here, and likely originate in a paramagnetic impurity phase.
34. A. Janossy, L. C. Brunel, and J. R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B 54, 10 186 (1996).
35. 1 contrast between the outer satellite and the main line.