On the theory of ion transfer rates across the interface of two immiscible liquids

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1618-1629

  Marcus, R A ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FLUOROMETERS; GIBBS FREE ENERGY; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); LIQUIDS; RATE CONSTANTS; SOLUBILITY;

AC IMPEDANCE; CHRONOABSORPTOMETRY; ION TRANSFER RATES; POTENTIAL MODULATED REFLECTANCE; POTENTIAL STEP CHRONOFLUOROMETRY;

CHARGE TRANSFER;

EID: 0034226976     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.481950     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Examples of reviews are (a) P. Vanysek, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2841 (1995);
2. (b) H. H. Girault, in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, edited by J. O'M. Bockris, B. E. Conway, and R. E. White (Plenum, New York, 1993), Vol. 25, p. 1;
3. (c) I. Benjamin, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 407 (1997);
4. (d) J. Koryta, in Ion-Transfer Kinetics, edited by J. R. Sandifer (VCH, New York, 1995), p. 1;
5. (e) H. H. Girault and D. J. Schiffrin, in Electroanalytical Chemistry, edited by A. J. Bard (Dekker, New York, 1989), Vol. 15, p. 1;
6. (f) Z. Samec and T. Kakiuchi, in Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Science, edited by H. Gerischer and C. W. Tobias (VCH, Weinheim, 1995), p. 297;
7. (g) I. Benjamin, Chem. Rev. 96, 1449 (1996);
8. (h) Z. Samec, in Liquid-Liquid Interfaces: Theory and Methods, edited by A. G. Volkov and D. W. Deamer (Chemical Rubber. Boca Raton, 1996), p. 155;
9. (i) The Interface Structure and Electrochemical Processes at the Boundary Between Two Immiscible Liquids, edited by V. E. Kazarinov (Springer, Berlin, 1987);
10. (j) K. B. Eisenthal, Chem. Rev. 96, 1343 (1996).
11. T. Wandlowski, V. Marecek, K. Holub, and Z. Samec, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 8204 (1989).
12. T. Kakiuchi, Y. Teranshi, and K. Niki, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2869 (1995).
13. Z. Samec, T. Kakiuchi, and M. Senda, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2971 (1995).
14. T. Kakiuchi and Y. Teranshi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 396, 401 (1995).
15. A. Lhotsky, K. Holub, P. Neuzil, and V. Marecek, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 3851 (1996).
16. Z. Samec, Electrochim. Acta 44, 85 (1998).
17. T. Kakiuchi and Y. Takasu, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 5963 (1997).
18. Z. Ding, F. Reymond, P. Baumgartner, D. J. Fermin, P.-F. Brevet, P.-A. Carrupt, and H. H. Girault, Electrochim. Acta 44, 3 (1998).
19. M. Senda, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2993 (1995).
20. T. Kakiuchi, J. Noguchi, and M. Senda, J. Electroanal. Chem. 336, 137 (1992).
21. V. Marecek, A. Lhotosky, and S. Racinsky, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2905 (1995); 40, 2909 (1995).
22. V. Marecek, A. Lhotosky, and S. Racinsky, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2905 (1995); 40, 2909 (1995).
23. P. D. Beattie, A. Delay, and H. H. Girault, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2961 (1995).
24. V. Maracek, M. Gratzl, A. Pungor, and J. Janata, J. Electroanal. Chem. 266, 239 (1989); V. Marecek, M. Gratzl. and J. Janata, ibid. 296, 537 (1990).
25. V. Maracek, M. Gratzl, A. Pungor, and J. Janata, J. Electroanal. Chem. 266, 239 (1989); V. Marecek, M. Gratzl. and J. Janata, ibid. 296, 537 (1990).
26. J. Josserand, J. Morandini, H. J. Lee, R. Ferrigno, and H. H. Girault, J. Electroanal. Chem. 468, 42 (1999).
27. T. Wandlowski, V. Marecek, Z. Samec, and R. Fuoco, J. Electroanal. Chem. 331, 765 (1992); Z. Samec (private communications), cf. Ref. 1(f).
28. T. Wandlowski, V. Marecek, Z. Samec, and R. Fuoco, J. Electroanal. Chem. 331, 765 (1992); Z. Samec (private communications), cf. Ref. 1(f).
29. J. A. Manzanes, R. Lahtinen, B. Quinn, K. Kontturi, and D. J. Schiffrin, Electrochim. Acta 44, 59 (1998).
30. Z. Samec, V. Marecek, J. Weber, and D. Homolka, J. Electroanal. Chem. 126, 105 (1981), see also Ref. 1(f).
31. H. H. Girault and D. J. Schiffrin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 244, 15 (1988); G. Geblewicz and D. J. Schiffrin, ibid. 244, 27 (1988).
32. H. H. Girault and D. J. Schiffrin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 244, 15 (1988); G. Geblewicz and D. J. Schiffrin, ibid. 244, 27 (1988).
33. V. J. Cunnane, D. J. Schiffrin, C. Beltran, G. Geblewicz, and T. J. Solomon, Electroanal. Chem. 247, 203 (1988).
34. Y. Cheng and D. J. Schiffrin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 319, 153 (1991).
35. Y. Cheng and D. J. Schiffrin, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 90, 2517 (1994).
36. C Wei, A. J. Bard, and M. V. Mirkin, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 16033 (1995).
37. M. Tsionsky, A. J. Bard, and M. V. Mirkin, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 17881 (1996).
38. M. Tsionsky, A. J. Bard and M. V. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 10785 (1997).
39. M.-H. Delville, M. Tsionsky, and A. J. Bard. Langmuir 14, 2774 (1998).
40. B. Liu and M. V. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 21, 8352 (1999).
41. Z. Ding, D. J. Fermin, P.-F. Brevet, and H. H. Girault, J. Electroanal. Chem. 458, 139 (1998).
42. H. D. Duong, P. F. Brevet, and H. H. Girault, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 117, 27 (1998).
43. D. J. Fermin, H. D. Duong, Z. Ding, P.-F. Brevet, and H. H. Girault, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 1461 (1999).
44. C. Shi and F. C. Anson, Anal. Chem. 70, 3114 (1998).
45. C. Shi and F. C. Anson, J. Phys. Chem. B 49, 9850 (1998).
46. C. Shi and F. C. Anson, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 6283 (1999).
47. H. Katano, K. Maeda, and M. Senda, J. Electroanal. Chem. 396, 391 (1995).
48. Y. Zu, F. R.-F. Fan, and A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 6272 (1999).
49. D. J. Fermin, A. Ding, H. D. Duong, P.-F. Brevet, and H. H. Girault, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 10334 (1998).
50. Z. H. Zhang, I. Tsuyumoto, T. Kitamori, and T. Sawada, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 10284 (1998).
51. Z. Samec, A. Trojanek, and J. Langmaier, J. Electroanal. Chem. 444, I (1998).
52. T. Wandlowski, V. Marecek, K. Holub, and Z. Samec, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2887 (1995).
53. K. Y. Lee, T. Chin, D. S. Ching, and E. Mazur, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 12876 (1993).
54. U.-S. Jeng, L. Esibov, L. Crow, and A. Steyerl, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 4955 (1998).
55. Z. Zhang, I. Tsuyumoto, T. Takahashi, T. Kitamori, and T. Sawada, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 4163 (1997).
56. A. Zarbakhsh, J. Bowers, and J. R. P. Webster, Meas. Sci. Technol. 10, 738 (1999).
57. C. M. Pereira, W. Schmickler, F. Silva, and M. J. Sousa, J. Electroanal. Chem. 436, 9 (1997).
58. I. Tsuyumoto, N. Noguchi, T. Kitamori, and T. Sawada, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 2684 (1998).
59. D. M. Mitrinovic, Z. I. Zhang, S. M. Williams, Z. Q. Huang, and M. L. Schlossman, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7421 (1999).
60. S. Ishizaka, S. Habuchi, H. B. Kim, and N. Kitamura, Anal. Chem. 71, 3382 (1999).
61. I. Benjamin, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 9500 (1998).
62. See also, Z. Samec, Yu, I. Kharkats, and Yu, Ya. Gurevich, J. Electroanal. Chem. 204, 257 (1986). Equation (10) there represents an approximate form of the present Eq. (1).
63. T. Kakiuchi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 322, 55 (1992).
64. W. Schmickler, J. Electroanal. Chem. 426, 5 (1997).
65. H. H. Girault and K. A. Muznetsov, J. Electroanal. Chem. 432, 19 (1997).
66. O. Pecina and W. Schmickler, J. EIectroanal. Chem. 450, 303 (1998). While this work discusses, instead, ion transfers at a solid electrode, we cite it because of its relevance to solvent extrusion, as discussed later in the text.
67. Z. Samec, J. Electroanal. Chem. 99, 197 (1979).
68. K. Aoki, Electrochim. Acta 41, 2321 (1996). V. J. Cunnane, D. J. Schiffrin, M. Fleischman, G. Geblewicz, and D. Williams, J. Electroanal. Chem. 243, 455 (1988).
69. K. Aoki, Electrochim. Acta 41, 2321 (1996). V. J. Cunnane, D. J. Schiffrin, M. Fleischman, G. Geblewicz, and D. Williams, J. Electroanal. Chem. 243, 455 (1988).
70. I. Benjamin, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 577 (1992).
71. T. M. Chang and L. X. Dang, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 6772 (1996).
72. I. Benjamin, Science 261, 1558 (1993).
73. I. Benjamin, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1432 (1992).
74. L. X. Dang, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 8195 (1999).
75. K. J. Schweighofer and I. Benjamin, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 9974 (1995).
76. P. A. Fernandes, M. N. D. S. Cordeiro, and J. A. N. F. Gomes, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 8930 (1999); P. A. Fernandes, M. N. D. S. Cordeiro, and J. A. N. F. Gomes, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 463, 151 (1999).
77. P. A. Fernandes, M. N. D. S. Cordeiro, and J. A. N. F. Gomes, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 8930 (1999); P. A. Fernandes, M. N. D. S. Cordeiro, and J. A. N. F. Gomes, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 463, 151 (1999).
78. K. J. Schweighofer and I. Benjamin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 391, 1 (1995).
79. K. Schweighofer and I. Benjamin, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 10274 (1999).
80. A. Pohorille and M. A. Wilson, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 284, 271 (1993).
81. (a) M. Hayoun, M. Meyer, and P. Turq, J. Phys. Chem. B 98, 6626 (1994);
82. (b) M. Meyer, M. Mareschal, and M. Hayoun, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 1067 (1988).
83. R. A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 1050 (1990).
84. R. A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 4152 (1990).
85. R. A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 2010 (1991).
86. Y. I. Kharkats and A. G. Volkov, J. Electroanal. Chem. 184, 435 (1985).
87. B. B. Smith, J. W. Halley, and A. Nozik, J. Chem. Phys. 205, 245 (1996).
88. W. Schmickler, J. Electroanal. Chem. 428, 123 (1997).
89. T. Kakiuchi, Electrochim. Acta 40, 2999 (1995).
90. Y. Marcus and A. S. Kertes, in Ion Exchange and Solvent Extraction of Metal Complexes, edited by A. J. Bard (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969).
91. B. H. Honig, W. L. Hubbell, and R. F. Flewelling, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 15, 163 (1986).
92. C. M. Starks, C. L. Liotia, and M. Halpern, Phase Transfer Catalysis (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994).
93. E.g., P. G. Bruce, A. Lisowaska-Oleksiak, P. Los, and C. A. Vincent, J. Electroanal. Chem. 367, 279 (1994).
94. H. H. Girault (private communication).
95. H. Brenner, Chem. Eng. Sci. 16, 242 (1961).
96. A. D. Maude, Br. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 293 (1961).
97. R. G. Cox and H. Brenner, Chem. Eng. Sci. 22, 1753 (1967).
98. G. I. Taylor, cited in W. Hardy and I. Bircumshaw, Proc. R. Soc. A 108, 12 (1925).
99. W. H. Walton, in Aerodynamic Capture of Particles, edited by E. G. Richardson (Pergamon, New York, 1960), p. 59.
100. (a) For example, the limiting behavior for small d is given by the asymptotic analysis for a solid interface in Eq. (2.48) of Ref. 80 as [6 π ηav ] (1 + (a/d) + 1/5 In(a/d)+k as d/a→0, where k ≅0.97.
101. (b) This problem is related, by symmetry, to that of two equal spheres approaching each other, since the free surface boundary condition in the original problem is obeyed on the plane bisecting their line of centers. The latter problem is singular and so the former is also, behaving as 1/d. The asymptotic expression for the force for the two-sphere problem is given by various authors, e.g., R. E. Hansford, Mathematika 17, 250 (1970); D. J. Jeffrey, ibid. 29, 58 (1982); M. D. A. Cooley and M. E. O'Neill, ibid. 16, 37 (1969).
102. (b) This problem is related, by symmetry, to that of two equal spheres approaching each other, since the free surface boundary condition in the original problem is obeyed on the plane bisecting their line of centers. The latter problem is singular and so the former is also, behaving as 1/d. The asymptotic expression for the force for the two-sphere problem is given by various authors, e.g., R. E. Hansford, Mathematika 17, 250 (1970); D. J. Jeffrey, ibid. 29, 58 (1982); M. D. A. Cooley and M. E. O'Neill, ibid. 16, 37 (1969).
103. (b) This problem is related, by symmetry, to that of two equal spheres approaching each other, since the free surface boundary condition in the original problem is obeyed on the plane bisecting their line of centers. The latter problem is singular and so the former is also, behaving as 1/d. The asymptotic expression for the force for the two-sphere problem is given by various authors, e.g., R. E. Hansford, Mathematika 17, 250 (1970); D. J. Jeffrey, ibid. 29, 58 (1982); M. D. A. Cooley and M. E. O'Neill, ibid. 16, 37 (1969).
104. -1.
105. F. P. Buff, A. A. Lovett, and F. H. Stillinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 621 (1965).
106. J. S. Rowlinson and B. Widom, Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982), p. 115.
107. For example, R. A. Marcus, Adv. Chem. Phys. 106, 1 (1999).
108. In Ref. 1(h), p. 156.
109. We use here the hard sphere radial distribution function at contact of about 5. R. O. Watts and I. J. McGee. Liquid State Chemical Physics (Wiley, New York, 1976). p. 137.
110. This caging effect should be distinguished from effects which lead to "stick" vs "slip" boundary conditions in the motion of an ion. In L. Bocquet, J.-P. Hansen, and J. Piasecki, J. Stat. Phys. 76, 527 (1994), there is a confirmation at the molecular level of the Stokes' "stick" boundary conditions at the surface of the solute; this recent computer simulation of a hard sphere solute (radius a) in a solvent of hard spheres (radius b) in the range a/b of 1-4.5 confirmed the stick hydrodynamic boundary condition for that system. However, the difference between diffusion constants for a Stokes' "stick" and "slip" boundary conditions is only a factor of 1.5, reflecting the long range nature of hydrodynamic interactions in the bulk fluid streamline potential, having terms which vary as 1/r. In contrast, the cage effect or the hydrodynamic effect close to surfaces, are both very large.
111. See also Fig. 4 in Ref. 63.
112. R. A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem. 72, 891 (1968).