Dynamics of activated escape and its observation in a semiconductor laser

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 78-81

  Hales, J ^a   Zhukov, A ^b   Roy, R ^c   Dykman, M I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BROWNIAN MOVEMENT; DIFFUSION; DYNAMICS; ELECTRONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

ACTIVATED ESCAPE; FLUCTUATING SYSTEM; METASTABLE STATE; OPTICAL FEEDBACK; POTENTIAL BARRIER; PREHISTORY DISTRIBUTION;

SEMICONDUCTOR LASERS;

EID: 0034225529     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.78     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R. Roy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1486 (1980); M. B. Willemsen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4815 (1999).
2. R. Roy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1486 (1980); M. B. Willemsen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4815 (1999).
3. A. M. Yacomotti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 292 (1999).
4. L. J. Lapidus, D. Enzer, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 899 (1999); M. I. Dykman et al., Phys. Rev. E 57, 5202 (1998).
5. L. J. Lapidus, D. Enzer, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 899 (1999); M. I. Dykman et al., Phys. Rev. E 57, 5202 (1998).
6. D. G. Luchinsky, P. V. E. McClintock, and M. I. Dykman, Rep. Progr. Phys. 61, 889 (1998).
7. M. I. Dykman et al., Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 17D, 661 (1995); L. Gammaitoni et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998); R. D. Astumian and F. Moss, Chaos 8, 533 (1998); K. Wiesenfeld and F. Jaramillo, Chaos 8, 539 (1998).
8. M. I. Dykman et al., Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 17D, 661 (1995); L. Gammaitoni et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998); R. D. Astumian and F. Moss, Chaos 8, 533 (1998); K. Wiesenfeld and F. Jaramillo, Chaos 8, 539 (1998).
9. M. I. Dykman et al., Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 17D, 661 (1995); L. Gammaitoni et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998); R. D. Astumian and F. Moss, Chaos 8, 533 (1998); K. Wiesenfeld and F. Jaramillo, Chaos 8, 539 (1998).
10. M. I. Dykman et al., Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 17D, 661 (1995); L. Gammaitoni et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998); R. D. Astumian and F. Moss, Chaos 8, 533 (1998); K. Wiesenfeld and F. Jaramillo, Chaos 8, 539 (1998).
11. L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Phys. Rev. 91, 1505 (1953).
12. M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzel, Random Perturbations in Dynamical Systems (Springer, New York, 1984); R. Graham, in Noise in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, edited by F. Moss and P. V. E. McClintock (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1989), Vol. 1, p. 225; M. I. Dykman, M. A. Krivoglaz, and S. M. Soskin, ibid., Vol. 2, p. 347.
13. M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzel, Random Perturbations in Dynamical Systems (Springer, New York, 1984); R. Graham, in Noise in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, edited by F. Moss and P. V. E. McClintock (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1989), Vol. 1, p. 225; M. I. Dykman, M. A. Krivoglaz, and S. M. Soskin, ibid., Vol. 2, p. 347.
14. M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzel, Random Perturbations in Dynamical Systems (Springer, New York, 1984); R. Graham, in Noise in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, edited by F. Moss and P. V. E. McClintock (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1989), Vol. 1, p. 225; M. I. Dykman, M. A. Krivoglaz, and S. M. Soskin, ibid., Vol. 2, p. 347.
15. M. I. Dykman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2718 (1992).
16. f lying at the top of a potential barrier was seen in analog simulations [P. V. E. McClintock (private communication)].
17. P. Hänggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990); V. I. Melnikov, Phys. Rep. 209, 1 (1991).
18. P. Hänggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251 (1990); V. I. Melnikov, Phys. Rep. 209, 1 (1991).
19. M. Suzuki, J. Stat. Phys. 16, 11 (1977); 16, 477 (1977).
20. M. Suzuki, J. Stat. Phys. 16, 11 (1977); 16, 477 (1977).
21. N. G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981).
22. In contrast to the present case, in the standard analysis [4.7] of interest are the optimal paths that start from the attractor and end at a given state.
23. A. Zhukov and M. I. Dykman (to be published).
24. R. Mannella, in Supercomputation in Nonlinear and Disordered Systems, edited by L. Vázquez, F. Tirando, and I. Martin (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p. 100.
25. A. Hohl, H. J. C. van der Linden, and R. Roy, Opt. Lett. 20, 2396 (1995).
26. G. Huyet et al., Europhys. Lett. 40, 619 (1997); G. Huyet et al., Opt. Commun. 149, 341 (1998).
27. G. Huyet et al., Europhys. Lett. 40, 619 (1997); G. Huyet et al., Opt. Commun. 149, 341 (1998).
28. G. Vaschenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5536 (1998).
29. A. Hohl and A. Gavrielides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1148 (1999).
30. C. H. Henry and R. F. Kazarinov, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 22, 294 (1986).