Microwave spectroscopy of heliumlike Rydberg states of H2 and D2: determinations of the dipole polarizabilities of H2+ and D2+ ground states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 012509-012501

  Jacobson, P L ^a   Komara, R A ^a   Sturrus, W G ^a,b   Lundeen, S R ^a  

^a Immunology and Pathology   (United States)

^b YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CARBON DIOXIDE LASERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEUTERIUM; ELECTRON BEAMS; ELECTRON RESONANCE; ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN; POSITIVE IONS; QUANTUM THEORY;

DIPOLE POLARIZABILITY; RYDBERG STATE;

GROUND STATE;

EID: 0034224476     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. W. G. Sturrus, E. A. Hessels, P. W. Arcuni, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3032 (1991).
2. Z. W. Fu, E. A. Hessels, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 46, R5313 (1993).
3. P. W. Arcuni, Z. W. Fu, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 42, R6950 (1990).
4. + system, see Christine A. Leach and Richard E. Moss, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 55 (1995).
5. P. L. Jacobson et al. Phys. Rev. A 56, R4361 (1998); 57, 4065(E) (1998).
6. P. L. Jacobson et al. Phys. Rev. A 56, R4361 (1998); 57, 4065(E) (1998).
7. G. D. Stevens and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4379 (1999).
8. R. W. Duntford, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 1978 (unpublished).
9. T. J. Morgan, C. F. Barnett, J. A. Ray, and A. Russek, Phys. Rev. A 20, 1062 (1979).
10. W. G. Sturrus, P. E. Sobol, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 792 (1985).
11. F. von Busch and G. H. Dunn, Phys. Rev. A 5, 1726 (1972).
12. W. G. Sturrus, E. A. Hessels, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1863 (1986).
13. +(0,0): b = 135.885, c = 19.99, d = 21.52. All results in MHz.
14. E. A. Hessels, W. G. Sturrus, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4489 (1987).
15. This is not quite correct for the transitions using the waveguide region (D), but the corrections are insignificant compared with experimental errors.
16. G. W. F. Drake, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 32, 93 (1994).
17. R. A. Komara, W. G. Sturrus, D. H. Pollack, and W. R. Cochran, Phys. Rev. A 59, 251 (1999).
18. J. F. Babb (private communication).
19. G. Hunter, A. W. Yau, and H. O. Pritchard, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 11 (1974).
20. L. Wolniewicz and J. D. Poll, Mol. Phys. 59, 953 (1986).
21. C. K. Au, G. Feinberg, and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. A 43, 561 (1991).
22. J. M. Taylor, A. Dalgarno, and J. F. Babb, Phys. Rev. A 60, R2630 (1999).
23. W. G. Sturrus, E. A. Hessels, P. W. Arcuni, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3032 (1991).
24. + ion by the applied electric field. A similar correction, of order ε, occurs in the quadrupole portion of the polarization potential. For this term, no comparable explanation has been found.
25. A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 233, 70 (1955).
26. Richard J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1253 (1985).
27. E. A. Hessels, P. W. Arcuni, F. J. Deck, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 46, 2622 (1992), and references therein.
28. A. K. Bhatia and R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 59, 205 (1999).
29. J. Shertzer and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1082 (1998).
30. R. E. Moss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 311, 231 (1999).