Brainstem auditory evoked potential wave V latency-intensity function in normal Dalmatian and Beagle puppies

Journal of veterinary internal medicine / American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 424-428

  Poncelet, L ^a   Coppens, A ^a   Deltenre, P ^b  

^a FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

^b BRUGMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; DOG; DOG DISEASE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; MALE; NEWBORN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BREEDING; DEAFNESS; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING TESTS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0034223452     PISSN: 08916640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb02251.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 1 Strain GM. Aetiology, prevalence and diagnosis of deafness in dogs and cats. Br Vet J 1996 ; 152: 17–36.
2. 2 Lurie MH. The membranous labyrinth in the congenitally deaf collie and Dalmatian dog. Laryngoscope 1948 ; 4: 279–287.
3. 3 Hudson WR, Durham NC, Ruben RJ. Hereditary deafness in the Damatian dog. Arch Otolaryngol 1962 ; 75: 39–45.
4. 4 Anderson H., Henricson B., Lundquist PG, et al. Genetic impairment in the Dalmatian dog. Acta Otolaryngol 1968 ; 23 (Suppl): 1–34.
5. 5 Igarashi M., Alford BR, Saito R., et al. Inner ear anomalies in dogs. Ann Otol 1972 ; 81: 249–255.
6. 6 Mair WS. Hereditary deafness in the Dalmatian dog. Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 1976 ; 212: 1–14.
7. 7 Branis M., Burda H. Inner ear structure in the deaf and normally hearing Dalmatian dog. J Comp Pathol 1985 ; 95: 295–299.
8. 8 Holliday TA, Nelson HJ, Williams DC, et al. Unilateral and bilateral brainstem auditory‐evoked responses abnormalities in 900 Dalmatian dogs. J Vet Intern Med 1992 ; 6: 166–174.
9. 9 Greibrock T. Hereditary deafness in the Dalmatian: Relationship to eye and coat color. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1994 ; 30: 170–176.
10. 10 Famula TR, Oberbauer AM, Sousa CA. A threshold model analysis of deafness in Dalmatian dog. Mamm Genome 1996 ; 7: 650–653.
11. 11 Wood JLN, Lakhani KH. Prevalence and prevention of deafness in the Dalmatian—Assessing the effect of parental hearing status and gender using ordinary logistic and generalized random litter effect model. Br Vet J 1997 ; 154: 121–123.
12. 12 Johnsson LG, Hawkins JE, Murasky AA, et al. Vascular anatomy and pathology of the cochlea in Dalmatian dogs. In: Darin de Lorenzo AJ, ed. Vascular Disorders and Hearing Defects. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press ; 1973: 249–295.
13. 13 Sims MH, Moore RE. Auditory‐evoked response in the clinically normal dog: Early latency components. Am J Vet Res 1984 ; 45: 2019–2027.
14. 14 Bodenhamer RD, Hunter JF, Luttgen PJ. Brain stem auditory‐evoked responses in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985 ; 46: 1787–1792.
15. 15 Strain GM, Tedford BL, Jackson RM. Postnatal development of the brain stem auditory‐evoked potential in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1991 ; 52: 410–415.
16. 16 Strain GM, Green KD, Twedt AC, et al. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials from bone stimulation in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993 ; 54: 1819–1821.
17. 17 Marshall AE. Brain stem auditory‐evoked response of the non‐anaesthetized dog. Am J Vet Res 1985 ; 46: 966–973.
18. 18 Venker‐van Haagen AJ, Siemeling RJG, Smoorenburg GF. Auditory brainstem responses in the normal Beagle. Vet Q 1989 ; 11: 129–137.
19. 19 Shiu JN, Munro KJ, Cox CL. Normative auditory brainstem response data for hearing threshold and neuro‐otological diagnosis in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1997 ; 38: 103–107.
20. 20 Gorga MP, Worthington DW, Reiland JK, et al. Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and pure‐tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1985 ; 6: 105–112.
21. 21 Yoshie N. Auditory nerve action potential responses to clicks in man. Laryngoscope 1968 ; 78: 198–215.
22. 22 Davis H. The second filter is real, but how does it work Am J Otolaryngol 1981 ; 2: 153–158.
23. 23 Schiemmel H., Rapin I., Cohen MM. Improving evoked response audiometry with special reference to the use of machine scoring. Audiology 1974 ; 13: 33–65.
24. 24 Wong PKH, Bickford RG. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: The use of noise estimate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980 ; 50: 25–34.
25. 25 Don M., Elberling C., Waring M. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984 ; 13: 219–228.
26. 26 Deltenre P., Mansbach AL. A new descriptor of the dual character of the input‐output behavior of the cochlea, with implications for signal‐to‐noise ratio estimation of brain‐stem auditory potentials evoked by alternating polarity clicks. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993 ; 88: 377–388.
27. 27 Poncelet L., Coppens A., Meuris S., et al. Maturation of the auditory system in dogs as reflected by BAEP wave V latency‐intensity curve and rarefaction‐condensation differential potentials changes. Am J Vet Res 2000. In press.
28. 28 Sterkers O., Ferrary E., Amiel C. Production of inner ear fluids. Physiol Rev 1988 ; 68: 1083–1128.
29. 29 Steel KP, Barkway C. Another role for melanocytes: Their importance for normal stria vascularis development in the mammalian inner ear. Development 1989 ; 107: 453–463.
30. 30 Kiang NYS, Liberman MC, Sewel WF, et al. Single unit clues to cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986 ; 22: 171–182.
31. 31 Pook HA, Steiss JE. Correlation of brain stem auditory‐evoked responses with cranium size and body weight of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1990 ; 51: 1779–83.
32. 32 Meij BP, Venker‐Van Haagen AJ, Van Den Brom WE. Relationship between latency of brainstem auditory evoked potentials and head size in dogs. Vet Q 1992 ; 14: 121–126.
33. 33 Shelton SB, Stockard‐Pope MS, Chrisman CL, et al. Brain stem auditory‐evoked responses to click and tone bursts in notched noise in Dalmatian puppies. Prog Vet Neurol 1993 ; 4: 31–36.
34. 34 Owen GA, Burkard R. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain‐stem auditory‐evoked responses to click stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1991 ; 89: 1760–1767.
35. 35 Burkard R., Hecox K. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1983 ; 74: 1204–1213.