Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 93-97

  Tanoue, Naomi ^a   Matsumura, Hideo ^a   Atsuta, Mitsuru ^a  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; POLYMER; RESIN; TOOTHPASTE; VITA MARK II;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTIFRICES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYMERS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTHBRUSHING;

EID: 0034222708     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107560     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Greener E, Duke S. Physical properties of two new crown and bridge veneering resins. JOral Rehabil 1989;16:203-9.
2. Yamaga T, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M. Hardness and fracture toughness of four commercial visible light-cured composite resin veneering materials. JOral Rehabil 1995;22:857-63.
3. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:358-64.
4. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Comparative evaluation of secondary heat treatment and a high intensity light source for the improvement of properties of prosthetic composites. JOral Rehabil 2000;27:288-93.
5. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Bfectiveness of polymerization of a prosthetic composite using three polymerization systems. JProsthet Dent 1999;82:336-40.
6. Lappalainen R, Yli-Urpo A, Seppa L. Wear of dental restorative and prosthetic materials in vitro. Dent Mater 1989;5:35-7.
7. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Localized three-body wear of six types of composite resin veneering materials. JProsthet Dent 1993;70:207-13.
8. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Effect of an adhesive primer on the integrity of occlusal veneer-metal interface and wear of composite resin veneered restorations. JProsthet Dent 1993;70:296-9.
9. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25: 425-30.
10. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 1994;10:269-74.
11. Matsumura H, Leinfelder KF. Three-body wear of light-activated composite veneering materials. JProsthet Dent 1995;73:233-9.
12. Ekfeldt A, Olio G. Occlusal contact wear of prosthodontic materials. An in vivo study. Acta Odontol Scand 1988;46:159-69.
13. Berge M, Silness J. The pattern and severity of wear of resin facings in fixed prosthetic restorations in vivo. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:269-76.
14. Ekfeldt A, Fransson B, Soderlund B, Olio G. Wear resistance of some prosthodontic materials in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:99-107.
15. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Caries associated microflora in plaque from orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:140-3.
16. Hefferren J. A laboratory method for assessment of dentifrice abrasivity. J Dent Res 1976;55:563-73.
17. Dickson G. Physical and chemical properties and wear. J Dent Res 1979;58:1535-43.
18. Harrington E, Jones PA, Fisher SE, Wilson HJ. Toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. A suggested standard method. Br Dent J 1982;153:135-8.
19. Kanter J, Koski RE, Martin D. The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resin from simulated toothbrushing. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:505-13.
20. Jones RM, Goodacre CJ, Moore BK, Dykema RW. A comparison of the physical properties of four prosthetic veneering materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:38-44.
21. Wictorin L. Effect of toothbrushing on acrylic resin veneering material. II. Abrasive effect of selected dentrifrices and toothbrushes. Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30:383-95.
22. Goldstein GR, Lerner T. The effect of toothbrushing on a hybrid composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:498-500.
23. Attin T, Buchalla W, Trett A, Hellwig E. Toothbrushing abrasion of poly-acid-modified composites in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:148-50.
24. Cannon ML, Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Cooley RO. Surface resistance to abrasion of performed laminate resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52:323-30.
25. Chung KH. The relationship between composition and properties of posterior resin composites. J Dent Res 1990;69:852-6.
26. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425-30.
27. Pagniano RP, Johnston WM. The effect of unfilled resin dilution on composite resin hardness and abrasion resistance. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:214-8.
28. Kawai K, Imai Y, Ebisu S. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:264-8.
29. Beatty MW, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Phillips RW, Roberts TA. Effect of microfiller fraction and silane treatment on resin composite properties. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:12-23.
30. Johannsen G, Redmalm G, Ryden H. Surface changes on dental materials. II. The influence of two different dentrifrices on surface roughness measured by laser reflexion and profilometer techniques. Swed Dent J 1992;16:13-20.
31. Ambjornsen E, Holland RI. In vitro abrasion of two acrylic veneers. Dent Mater 1994;10:107-10.
32. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Miquel C. Surface roughness of finished composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:742-9.