Revisiting the constraint attunement hypothesis: Reply to Ericsson, Patel, and Kintsch (2000) and Simon and Gobet (2000)

Psychological Review

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 601-608

  Vicente, Kim J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ENVIRONMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034222342     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.601     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1991). The place of cognitive architectures in a rational analysis. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence: The Twenty-Second Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217.
3. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
4. Coughlin, L. D., & Patel, V. L. (1987). Processing of critical information by physicians and medical students. Journal of Medical Education, 62, 818-828.
5. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
6. Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.
7. Ericsson, K. A., Patel, V., & Kintsch, W. (2000). How experts' adaptations to representative task demands account for the expertise effects in memory recall: Comment on Vicente and Wang (1998). Psychological Review, 107, 578-592.
8. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Gigerenzer, G. G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford Unversity Press.
11. Gobet, F. (1997). A pattern-recognition theory of search in expert problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 3, 291-313.
12. Gobet, F. (1998). Expert memory: A comparison of four theories. Cognition, 66, 115-152.
13. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1-40.
14. Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581-598.
15. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Lewontin, R. C. (1979). Sociobiology as an adaptationist program. Behavioral Science, 24, 5-14.
17. Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 11-24). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Rasmussen, J. (1985). The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 234-243.
19. Richman, H. B., Staszewski, J. J., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV. Psychological Review, 102, 305-330.
20. Rossi, J. S. (1997). A case study in the failure of psychology as a cumulative science: The spontaneous recovery of verbal learning. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 175-197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1997). Eight common false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 37-64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
23. Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
25. Simon, H. A., & Gobet, F. (2000). Expertise effects in memory recall: Comment on Vicente and Wang (1998). Psychological Review, 107, 593-600.
26. Stewart, T. R., Roebber, P. J., & Bosart, L. F. (1997). The importance of the task in analyzing expert judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 205-219.
27. Tolman, E., & Brunswik, E. (1935). The organism and the causal texture of the environment. Psychological Review, 42, 43-77.
28. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Vicente, K. J., & Wang, J. H. (1998). An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall. Psychological Review, 105, 33-57.