Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay and comparison to other serological assays for the detection of serum antibodies to Brucella abortus in bison

Journal of Wildlife Diseases

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 469-476

  Gall, D ^a,e   Nielsen, K ^a   Forbes, L ^a   Davis, D ^b   Elzer, P ^c   Olsen, S ^d   Balsevicius, S ^a   Kelly, L ^a   Smith, P ^a   Tan, S ^a   Joly, D ^c  

^a CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY   (Canada)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL ANIMAL DISEASE CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bison; Brucella abortus; Competitive enzyme immunoassay; Fluorescence polarization assay; Validation

Indexed keywords

BISON; BISON BISON; BRUCELLA; BRUCELLA MELITENSIS BIOVAR ABORTUS; BUBALUS;

BACTERIUM ANTIBODY; BRUCELLA VACCINE;

AGGLUTINATION TEST; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BRUCELLA ABORTUS; BRUCELLOSIS; BUFFALO; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLEMENT FIXATION TEST; CROSS REACTION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY; IMMUNOLOGY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; VACCINATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGGLUTINATION TESTS; ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; AREA UNDER CURVE; BISON; BRUCELLA ABORTUS; BRUCELLA VACCINE; BRUCELLOSIS; COMPLEMENT FIXATION TESTS; CROSS REACTIONS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VACCINATION;

EID: 0034221740     PISSN: 00903558     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-36.3.469     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BULMER, W. S. 1989. Canada's captive wild ungulate program. In Proceedings 93rd Annual Meeting. United States Animal Health Association, Victor P. Labranche (ed.). Carter Printing Company, Richmond, Virginia, pp. 595-598.
2. CHOQUETTE, L. P. E. 1961. Diseases and parasites of bison. In Canadian Wildlife Service research progress, 1961. Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada pp. 42-44 (Catalog number 58469-8-1).
3. COHN, J. P. 1991. New focus on wildlife health. Bioscience 41: 448-450.
4. DAVIS, D. S., J. W. TEMPLETON, T. A. FICHT, J. D. WILLIAMS, J. D. KOPEC, AND L. G. ADAMS. 1990. Brucella abortus in captive bison. I. Serology, bacteriology; pathogensis and transmission to cattle. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 26: 360-371.
5. _, _, _, J. D. HUBER, R. D. ANGUS, AND L. G. ADAMS. 1991. Brucella abortus in Bison II. Evaluation of strain 19 vaccination of pregnant cows. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 27: 258-264.
6. DEYOUNG, H. G. 1973. The bison is beleaguered again. Natural History 82: 48-55.
7. FLAGG, D. E. 1983. A case history of a brucellosis outbreak in a brucellosis free state which originated in bison. In Proceedings 87th Annual Meeting, United States Animal Health Association, J. B. Armstrong (ed.). Carter Printing Company, Richmond, Virginia, pp. 171-172.
8. HENNING, D., AND K. NIELSEN. 1992. Cross-reactivity of monoclonal antibodies to bovine immunoglobulins with immunoglobulins of other species. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 34: 235-243.
9. MACMILLAN, A. P., I. GREISER-WILKE, V. MOENING, AND L. A. MATHIAS. 1990. A competition enzyme immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis. DTW Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 97: 83-85.
10. MOHLER, J. R. 1917. Abortion disease. In Annual reports of the Department of Agriculture, USDA. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., pp. 105-106.
11. NICOLETTI, P. 1992. An evaluation of serologic tests used to diagnose brucellosis in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Tropical Animal Health and Production 24: 40-44.
12. NIELSEN, K. H., J. CHERWONOGRODZKY, J. R. DUNCAN, AND D. R. BUNDLE. 1989. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for differentiation of the antibody response of cattle naturally infected with Brucella abortus or vaccinated with strain 19. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50: 5-9.
13. _, L. KELLY, D. GALL, P. SMITH, J. BOSSÉ, P. NICOLETTI, AND W. KELLY. 1994. The use of divalent cation chelating agents (EDTA/EGTA) to reduce non-specific protein interaction in enzyme immunoassay. Veterinary Research Communications 18: 433-437.
14. _, _, _, P. NICOLETTI, AND W. KELLY. 1995. Improved competitive enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 46: 285.
15. _, D. GALL, W. KELLY, A. VIGLIOCCO, D. HENNING, AND M. M. GARCIA. 1996a. Immunoassay development: Application to enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Brucellosis. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Animal Diseases Research Institute, Nepean, Ontario, Canada, 118 pp.
16. _, _, M. JOLLEY, G. LEISHMAN, S. BALSEVICIUS, P. SMITH, P. NICOLETTI, AND F. THOMAS. 1996b. A homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay for the detection of antibody to Brucella abortus Journal of Immunological Methods 195: 161-168.
17. OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES. 1996. Manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines. 3rd Edition, Office International des Epizooties, Paris, France, 723 pp.
18. RYLATT, D. B., D. M. WYATT, AND P. G. BUKDESEN. 1985. A competitive enzyme immunoassay for the detection of bovine antibodies to Brucella abortus using monoclonal antibodies. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 8: 261-271.
19. SAMAGH, B. S., AND P. BOULANGER. 1978. Adaption of the Technicon Autoanalyzer II for an automated complement fixation test for detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in bovine serums. In American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (Pub.), 21st Annual Proceedings, D. C. Kradel (ed.). Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 347-366. American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 21st Annual Proceedings, Buffalo, New York. pp. 347-366.
20. SAMAGH, B. S., AND P. BOULANGER. 1978. Adaption of the Technicon Autoanalyzer II for an automated complement fixation test for detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in bovine serums. In American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (Pub.), 21st Annual Proceedings, D. C. Kradel (ed.). Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 347-366. American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 21st Annual Proceedings, Buffalo, New York. pp. 347-366.
21. SCHOOJANS, F., A. ZALATA, C. E. DEPUYDT, AND F. H. COMHAIRE. 1995. Medcalc: A new computer program for medical statistics. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 48: 257-262.
22. TESSARO, S. V. 1986. The existing and potential importance of brucellosis and tuberculosis in Canadian wildlife: A review. Canadian Veterinary Journal 27: 119-124.
23. _. 1989. Review of the diseases, parasites, and miscellaneous pathological condition of North American Bison. Canadian Veterinary Journal 30: 416-422.
24. THORNE, E. T., J. K. MORTON, AND G. M. THOMAS. 1978. Brucellosis in elk. I. Serologic and bacteriologic survey in Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 14: 74-81.
25. WRIGHT, A. E., AND F. SMITH. 1897. Application of a serum test to the differential diagnosis of typhoid and Malta fever. Lancet i: 656.