|
Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 144-148
|
Comparison of two methods for laboratory diagnosis of influenza virus;Comparacion de dos tecnicas para el diagnostico de laboratorio de infecciones por el virus influenza
|
Author keywords
Diagnosis; Immunofluorescence; Influenza; Tissue culture isolation
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ANIMAL CELL;
ARTICLE;
HUMAN;
IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE;
INFLUENZA;
INFLUENZA VIRUS;
NONHUMAN;
TISSUE CULTURE;
VIRUS CULTURE;
ANIMAL;
ARGENTINA;
CELL LINE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CYTOPATHOGENIC EFFECT;
DOG;
EVALUATION;
FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE;
GUINEA PIG;
HEMAGGLUTINATION TEST;
IMMUNOLOGY;
INFLUENZA VIRUS A;
ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION;
MIDDLE AGED;
NOSE CAVITY;
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE;
PHARYNX;
SEASON;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TIME;
VIROLOGY;
VIRUS ANTIBODY;
ADULT;
ANIMALS;
ANTIBODIES, VIRAL;
ARGENTINA;
CELL LINE;
CYTOPATHOGENIC EFFECT, VIRAL;
DOGS;
FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE, INDIRECT;
GUINEA PIGS;
HEMAGGLUTINATION TESTS;
HUMANS;
INFLUENZA A VIRUS;
INFLUENZA, HUMAN;
MIDDLE AGED;
NASAL CAVITY;
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE;
PHARYNX;
SEASONS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TIME FACTORS;
VIRUS CULTIVATION;
|
EID: 0034219911
PISSN: 03257541
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (15)
|