Evaluation of a hemostasis model for teaching ovariohysterectomy in veterinary surgery

Veterinary Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 309-316

  Griffon, Dominique J ^a,b   Cronin, Paul ^a   Kirby, Barbara ^a   Cottrell, David F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; DOG; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS; HYSTERECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; OVARIECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; DOGS; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HYSTERECTOMY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OVARIECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, VETERINARY;

EID: 0034219188     PISSN: 01613499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jvet.2000.7541     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Carpenter LG, Piermattei DL, Salmon MD, et al: A comparison of surgical training with live anesthetized dogs and cadavers. Vet Surg 20:373-378, 1991
2. Johnson AL, Farmer JA: Evaluation of traditional and alternative models in psychomotor laboratories for veterinary surgery. J Vet Med Educ 16:11-13, 1989
3. Pavletic MM, Schwartz A, Berg J, et al: An assessment of the outcome of the alternative medical and surgical laboratory program at Tufts University. J Am Vet Med Assoc 205:97-100, 1994
4. Smeak DD, Beck LB, Shaffer CA, et al: Evaluation of video tape and a simulator for instruction of basic surgical skills. Vet Surg 20:30-36, 1991
5. Bauer MS: A survey of the use of live animals, cadavers, inanimate models, and computers in teaching veterinary surgery. J Am Vet Med Assoc 203:1047-1051, 1993
6. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ, et al: Comparison of surgical skills of veterinary students trained using models or live animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 206:1840-1845, 1995
7. Lewis LA, Nusbaum BP: Varaderm: A skin substitute for surgical workshops. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 13:473-474, 1987
8. Holmberg DL, Cockshutt JR, Basher AWP: Use of a dog abdominal surrogate for teaching surgery. J Vet Med Educ 20:61-62, 1993
9. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Arends MW, et al: Development of parenchymal abdominal organ models for use in teaching veterinary soft tissue surgery. Vet Surg 22:357-362, 1993
10. Greenfield CL, Johnson AL, Smith CW, et al: Integrating alternative models into the existing surgical curriculum. J Vet Med Educ 21:23-27, 1994
11. Olsen D, Bauer MS, Seim HB, et al: Evaluation of a hemostasis model for teaching basic surgical skills. Vet Surg 25:49-58, 1996
12. Pearson H: The complications of ovariohysterectomy in the bitch. J Small Anim Pract 14:257-266, 1973
13. Dorn AS, Swist RA: Complications of canine ovariohysterectomy. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 13:720-724, 1977
14. Berzon JL: Complications of elective ovariohysterectomies in the dog and cat at a teaching institution: Clinical review of 853 cases. Vet Surg 8:89-91, 1979
15. Pollari FL, Bonnett BN, Bamsey SC, et al: Postoperative complications of elective surgeries in dogs and cats determined by examining electronic and paper records. J Am Vet Med Assoc 208:1882-1886, 1996
16. Fingland RB. Ovariohysterectomy, in Bojrab MJ (ed): Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (ed 4). Philadelphia, PA, Lea & Febiger, 1998, pp 489-496
17. Smeak DD, Hill LN, Beck ML, et al: Evaluation of an autotutorial-simulator program for instruction of hollow organ closure. Vet Surg 23:519-528, 1994
18. Jennings PB: Alternative to the use of living animals in the student surgery laboratory. J Vet Med Educ 13:14-15, 1986
19. Appel LD, Manfra-Maretta S, Siegel AM, et al: Fresh frozen tissue specimen: An alternative approach to teaching introductory soft tissue surgery to veterinary students. Vet Surg 26:408, 1997 (abstr)
20. Gambardella PC: The pros and cons of survival surgery in the teaching lab. J Vet Med Educ 13:13-14, 1986