Biological derivation of a range of cephalometric norms for children of African American descent (after Steiner)

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 90-100

  Anderson, Arnett A ^a   Anderson, Angela C ^b   Hornbuckle, Andrea C ^c   Hornbuckle, Kelvin ^d  

^a HOWARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Pediatrics ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEGRO; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REFERENCE VALUE; STANDARD; TOOTH OCCLUSION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034219153     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.103258     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Steiner CC, Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-55.
2. Steiner CC, Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 1959;29:8-29.
3. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960;46:721-35.
4. Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogel DS. JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedure. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:145-56.
5. Altemus LA. Cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod 1968;38:175-84.
6. Altemus LA. Frequency of the incidence of malocclusion in American Negro children aged twelve to sixteen. Angle Orthod 1959;29:189-200.
7. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics, 4th edition. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc; 1988. p. 256-9.
8. Hitchcock H. A cephalometric description of Class II Division I malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:414-23.
9. Jacobson A. The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975;67:125-38.
10. Kim YVJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1978:73: 619-33.
11. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships, their significance in analysis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1948; 34:813-40.
12. Lundström A, McWilliam JS. Dento-alveolar compensation for anterio-posterior variations between the upper and lower apical bases. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:116-22.
13. Riolo M, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Craniofacial Growth and Development, University of Michigan: 1974.
14. Drummond R. Determinations of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod 1968;54:670-82.
15. Jacobson A, The craniofacial skeletal pattern of the South African Negro. Am J Orthod 1978;78:681-91.
16. Alexander TL, Hitchcock HP. Cephalometric standards for American Negro children. Am J Orthod 1978;74:298-304.
17. Richardson ER. Atlas of craniofacial growth in Americans of African descent, vol 26, 1st edition. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development; 1991. p. 1-256.
18. Beatty E. A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships. Am J Orthod 1975;68:303-15.
19. Ferrazzini G. Critical evaluation of the ANB angle. Am J Orthod 1976;69:620-6.
20. Jacobson A. Application of the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod 1976;70:179-89.
21. Rotberg SF, Kane J, Shapiro E. Prediction of the Wits appraisal from the A-N-B angle. Am J Orthod 1980;77:636-42.
22. Bishara S, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the A-N-B angle and Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod 1983;84:133-9.
23. Jarvinen S. An analysis of the variation of the A-N-B angle: a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod 1985;87:144-6.
24. Sherman SW, Nanda RS. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:429-36.
25. Jacobson A. Update of the Wits appraisal. Angle Orthod 1988; 58:205-19.
26. Graber, TM. The three M’s: muscles, malformation, and malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1963;49:418-50.
27. Hasund A, Ulstein G. The position of the incisors in relation to the NA and NB lines in different facial types. Am J Orthod 1970;57:1-14.
28. Anderson R. The evaluation of post orthodontic treatment soft tissue profiles in African-American patients [Thesis]. University of Louisville (KY): 1997.
29. Deloach N. Soft tissue facial profile of North American Black: a self-assessment [Thesis]. University of Detroit, Detroit, MI.
30. Graber L. Psycho-social implications of dentofacial appearance [Doctoral dissertation]. Ann Arbor: Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan: 1980.
31. Scott S. A comparison of the esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in African Americans [Thesis]. The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor; 1996.