Treatment without consent: A medicolegal precedent

Lancet

Volumn 355, Issue 9223, 2000, Pages 69-

  Yate, R M ^a   Milling, M A P ^a   McFadzean, W ^a  

^a Bryn y mor   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ASSAULT; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CASE REPORT; COURT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; BURN; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; JEHOVAH'S WITNESS; LEGAL APPROACH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; RE L (MEDICAL TREATMENT: GILLICK COMPETENCY); RELIGIOUS APPROACH; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

LEGAL APPROACH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; RE L (MEDICAL TREATMENT: GILLICK COMPETENCY); RELIGIOUS APPROACH;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BURNS; CHRISTIANITY; HUMANS; JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; THIRD-PARTY CONSENT; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 0034218263     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02444-2     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. DJ Dye Requirements for cross-matched blood in burns surgery Burns 19 1993 524 528
2. Wason V and Associates. Court Order (Family Division of the High Court of Justice). Re: L (A Minor) 1998, June 1–10
3. V Harpwood Refusal of medical treatment Med Law Monitor 5(10) 1998 1 2
4. Anon Butterworths Med-Leg Rep 7 1998 147 163