Primacy and frequency effects in absolute judgments of visual velocity

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 998-1007

  Sokolov, Alexander ^a,d   Pavlova, Marina ^b,d   Ehrenstein, Walter H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS;

EID: 0034217936     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212084     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ALGOM, D., & MARKS, L. E. (1990). Range and regression, loudness scales and loudness processing: Toward a context-bound psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 706-727.
2. BAIRD, J. C. (1997). Sensation and judgment: Complementarity theory of psychophysics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. DI LOLLO, V. (1964). Contrast effects in the judgment of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 383-387.
4. ERLEBACHER, A., & SEKULER, R. (1971). Response frequency equalization: A bias model for psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 315-320.
5. GUILFORD, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. HAUBENSAK, G. (1982). Eine weitere Vereinfachung der Range-Frequency-Theorie des absoluten Urteils [Another simplification of the range-frequency model for absolute judgments]. Psychologische Beiträge, 24, 352-355.
7. HAUBENSAK, G. (1985). Absolutes und vergleichendes Urteil: Eine Einführung in die Theorie psychischer Bezugssysteme [Absolute and comparative judgments: An introduction to the theory of psychical reference systems]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. HAUBENSAK, G. (1989). Primacy-Effekte in psychophysischen Urteilen [Primacy effects in psychophysical judgments]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 36, 42-56.
9. HAUBENSAK, G. (1992). The consistency model: A process model for absolute judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 303-309.
10. JESTEADT, W., LUCE, R. D., & GREEN, D. M. (1977). Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 92-104.
11. JOHNSON, N. L., & KOTZ, S. (1977). Urn models and their application. New York: Wiley.
12. LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1984). Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 27-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. MANDRIOTA, F. J., MINTZ, D. E., & NOTTERMAN, J. M. (1962). Visual velocity discrimination: Effects of spatial and temporal cues. Science, 138, 437-438.
14. MARKS, L. E. (1968). Stimulus-range, number of categories, and form of category scale. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 467-479.
15. PARDUCCI, A. (1954). Learning variables in the judgment of single stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 24-30.
16. PARDUCCI, A. (1956). Direction of shift in the judgment of single stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 169-178.
17. PARDUCCI, A. (1959). An adaptation-level analysis of ordinal effects in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 239-246.
18. PARDUCCI, A. (1963). Range-frequency compromise in judgment. Psychological Monographs, General & Applied, 77(Pt. 2), 1-50.
19. PARDUCCI, A. (1983). Category ratings and the relational character of judgment. In H.-G. Geissler & V. Sarris (Eds.), Modern issues in perception (pp. 262-282). Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
20. PARDUCCI, A. (1992). Comment on Haubensak's associative theory of judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 310-313.
21. PARDUCCI, A., CALFEE, R. C. , MARSHALL, L. M., & DAVIDSON, L. P. (1960). Context effects in judgment: Adaptation level as a function of the mean, midpoint, and median of the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 65-77.
22. PARDUCCI, A., KNOBEL, S., & THOMAS, C. (1976). Independent contexts for category ratings: A range-frequency analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 360-366.
23. PARDUCCI, A., & PERRETT, L. F. (1971). Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 89, 427-452.
24. PARDUCCI, A., & WEDELL, D. H. (1986). The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 496-516.
25. POULTON, E. C. (1968). The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 1-19.
26. POULTON, E. C. (1979). Models for biases in judging sensory magnitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 777-803.
27. SANDER K., & SARRIS, V. (1997). Das "Two Stimulus - Two Choice" - Paradigma für die Psychophysik: Range-Frequency-Modell und Adaptation-Level-Theorie im Vergleich [The "two stimulus - Two choice" paradigm in psychophysics: A comparison of the range-frequency model and the adaptation-level theory]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 44, 431-446.
28. SCHIFFERSTEIN, H. N. J., & FRIJTERS, J. E. R. (1992). Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 243-255.
29. SCHÜßLER, S. (1981). Range-Frequency Theorie und Orientierungstheorie [Range-frequency theory and orientation theory]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Julius Maximilians University, Würzburg.
30. SOKOLOV, A. N., & EHRENSTEIN, W. H. (1996). Absolute judgments of visual velocity: Frequency- or presentation-order effect? In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Fechner Day '96: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 57-62). Padua: International Society for Psychophysics.
31. STEVENS, S. S. (1971). Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 78, 426-450.
32. STEVENS, S. S., & GALANTER, E. H. (1957). Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 377-411.
33. TVERSKY, A., & KAHNEMAN, D. (1974). Judgment and uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
34. WARD, L. M., & LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1970). Sequential effects and memory in category judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 27-34.
35. WEDELL, D. H. (1984). A process model for psychophysical judgment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3102-B. (University Microfilms International No. 8428589)
36. WEDELL, D. H. (1990). Methods for determining the locus of context effects in judgment. In J. P. Caverni, J. M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 285-302). New York: Elsevier.