Good sports?: Historical perspective on the political economy of intercollegiate athletics in the era of title IX, 1972-1997

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2000, Pages

  Thelin, John R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034215266     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2649145     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Alexander, L. (1993). Revenues and expenditures in intercollegiate athletics: The feasibility of collecting national data by sport. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
2. Arace, J. (1997, June 3). Scholarship bias in women's sports charged. USA Today, pp. 1A, 1C, 8C.
3. Associated Press. (1991, July 9). When colleges look at sports, they see red. Long Beach, CA: Press-Telegram.
4. Associated Press. (1997a, June 24). Title IX still debated while impact grows. Lexington, KY: Herald-Leader, pp. C1, C3.
5. Associated Press. (1997b, April 29). Women ten years away from equity, NCAA says. Lexington, KY: Herald-Leader, p. C3.
6. Atwell, R. H., Grimes, B., & Lopiano, D. A. (1980). The money game: Financing collegiate athletics. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
7. Bok, D. C. (1980, Winter). The federal government and the University. The Public Interest, 57, 80-101.
8. Boucher, N. (1997, May). Title IX redux: The Supreme Court bows out. Brown Alumni Monthly, 97, 8, 13.
9. Brady, E. (1997, April 22). Ex-Brown player hails Title IX court move. USA Today, p. 3C.
10. Brief of Amid Curiae in the Supreme Court of the United States. (1996, October Term). Brown University et al. v. Amy Cohen et al., No. 96-1321.
11. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1982). Control of the campus: A report on the governance of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Author.
12. Chambers, M. (1997, June 17). Equity law for women in sports turns 25. Lexington KY: Herald-Leader, p. A3.
13. Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives. (1989, May 18, 24). Hearings before the Committee on Postsecondary Education. United States Congress, Serial No. 101-22.
14. Farrell, J. (1997, April 22). High Court reinforces sex 'parity' in athletics: Rejects Brown University appeal on funds for sports teams. Boston Globe, pp. A1, A5.
15. Glazer, N. (1979, Summer). Regulating business and the universities: One problem or two? The Public Interest, 42-65.
16. Haworth, K. (1998, March 28). Federal appeals court clears way for Title IX to apply to the NCAA. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A51.
17. Hodges, J. (1997a, December 27). Football team dominates fiscally: UCLA Bruins' profit margin is as healthy as their victory margin, which bodes well for nonrevenue-producing programs. Los Angeles Times, p. C8.
18. Hodges, J. (1997b, December 29). Dallas trip costly for Bruins. Los Angeles Times, p. C10.
19. Jenkins, S. (1985, May 11). Lack of money means fewer victories at Maryland. Washington Post, n.p.
20. Kerr, C. (1963). The uses of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Knight Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. (1991). Keeping faith with the student-athlete: A new model for intercollegiate athletics. Charlotte, NC: Knight Foundation.
22. Knight Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. (1992). A solid start: A report on reform of intercollegiate athletics. Charlotte, NC: Knight Foundation.
23. Levine, A. (1997, January 31). Higher education's new status as a mature industry. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A48.
24. Lopiano , D. A., & Zotos, C. (1991). Equity issues and policy problems in women's intercollegiate athletics. In R. Lapchick & J. Slaughter (Eds.), The rules of the game (pp. 31-54). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
25. Mauro, T. (1997, April 22). Sex equity in sports backed: Court supports Title IX. USA Today, pp. 1A, 3C.
26. Nader, S. J. (1988). Financing intercollegiate athletics in the Southeastern Conference, 1970-1979. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
27. National Association of College and University Business Officers. (1993). The financial management of intercollegiate athletics programs. Washington, DC: NACUBO.
28. Naughton, J. (1996, November 29). NCAA releases report on Division I and II program revenues. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A44.
29. Naughton, J. (1997a, April 25). Advocates on all sides of the Title IX debate look to the Supreme Court. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A41-42.
30. Naughton, J. (1997b, May 2). Supreme Court rejects Brown's appeal on women in sports: Advocates for female athletes see outcome as a major victory. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A45-A46.
31. Naughton, J., & Srisavasdi, R. (1996, October 25). New law shows disparity in funds for men's and women's teams. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A45.
32. Palmer, B. (1981). Lobbying the legislature: How to win equity in athletics. In P. Allberger (Ed.), Winning techniques for athletic fund-raising. Washington, DC: Council for Advancement and Support of Education.
33. Raiborn, M. H. 1978). Revenues and expenses of intercollegiate athletics programs: Analysis of financial trends and relationships, 1970-1974. Mission, KS: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
34. Raiborn, M. H. (1986). Revenues and expenses of intercollegiate athletics programs: Analysis of financial trends and relationships, 1981-1985. Mission, KS: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
35. Rolnick, J. (1998, October 12). NCAA study finds Division I and II sports programs ailing financially. Chronicle of Higher Education, n. p.
36. Sanoff, A. P. (1990, January 8). The price of victory: College sports vs. education. U.S. News and World Report, p. 52.
37. Szanton, A. (1993, October). On balance: Title IX and Brown's women athletes: Is the playing field level? Brown Alumni Monthly, pp. 20-27.
38. Suggs, W. (1999, May 21). More women participate in intercollegiate athletics: But survey of Division I colleges shows disparities in financing for men's and women's teams. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A44.
39. Thelin, J. R. (1996). Games colleges play: Scandal and reform in intercollegiate athletics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Thelin, J. R., & Wiseman, L. L. (1989). The old college try: Balancing athletics and academics in higher education. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC.
41. Thelin, J. R., & Wiseman, L. L. (1992). The numbers game: The statistical heritage in intercollegiate athletics. In B. I. Mallette & R. D. Howard (Eds.), Monitoring and assessing intercollegiate athletics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 5-12.
42. Time. (1974, December 2). A Majors success, p. 84.