Adolescent perception of peer success: A gendered perspective over time

Sex Roles

Volumn 43, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 61-84

  Quatman, Teri ^a   Sokolik, Elizabeth ^a   Smith, Karin ^a  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034214627     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007039712348     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., & Katz, P. A. (1991). Mastery motivation in boys and girls: The role of intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. Sex Roles, 25(9-10), 511-520.
2. Bornstein, R. F., Rossner, S. C., Hill, E. L., & Stepanian, M. L. (1994). Face validity and fakahility of objective and projective measures of dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 363-386.
3. Brady, K., Trafimow, D., Eisler, R., & Southard, D. (1996). The role of causal attributions in competitive situations. Sex Roles, 35(9-10), 639-650.
4. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59-79.
5. Callahan, C. M., Cunningham, C. M., & Plucker, J. A. (1994). Foundations of the future: The socio-emotional development of gifted, adolescent women, Roeper Review, 17(2), 99-105.
6. Carter, B. D. (1987). Current conceptions of sex roles and sex stereotyping: Theory and Research. New York: Praeger.
7. Cole, D. A., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L. A., Seroczynski, A. D., & Fier, J. (1999). Children's over-and underestimation of academic competence: A longitudinal study of gender differences, depression and anxiety. Child Development, 70(2), 459-473.
8. Danzinger, N. (1983). Sex-related differences in the aspirations of high school students. Sex Roles, 9, 683-694.
9. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39(2), 105-116.
10. Dunnell, P. A., & Bakken, L. (1991). Gifted high school students' attitudes toward careers and sex roles. Roeper Review, 13(4), 198-202.
11. Eaton, Y. M., Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (1991). Gender differences in the development of relationships during late adolescence. Adolescence, 26(103), 565-568.
12. Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135-171.
13. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43(2), 95-103.
14. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Crites, J. O. (1980). Toward a career psychology of women: What do we know? What do we need to know? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27(1), 44-62.
15. Flanagan, R., & di Giuseppe, R. (1999). Critical review of the TEMAS: A step within the development of thematic apperception instruments. Psychology in the Schools, 36(1), 21-30.
16. Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 237-254.
17. Fried-Buchalter, S. (1997). Fear of success, fear of failure, and the imposter phenomenon among male and female marketing managers. Sex Roles, 37(11-12), 847-859.
18. Harris, J. R. (1999). How to succeed in childhood. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), The nature-nurture debate: Essential readings in developmental psychology (pp. 83-95). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
19. Hawley, P. (1971). What women think men think: Does it affect their career choice? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18(3), 193-199.
20. Hay, C. A., & Bakken, L. (1991). Gifted sixth grade girls: Similarities and differences in attitudes among gifted girls, non-gifted peers, and their mothers. Roeper Review, 13(3), 158-160.
21. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectancies during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological, psychological, and social perspectives (pp. 201-228). New York: Plenum Press.
22. Holland, D. C., & Eisenhart, M. A. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement and the college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Hollinger, C. L. (1991). Facilitating the career development of gifted young women. Roeper Review, 13(3), 135-139.
24. Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 254-259.
25. Horner, M. (1969). Failing: Bright women. Psychology Today, 3(6), 36-38.
26. Horner, M. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-175.
27. Ireland, M. S. (1993). Reconceiving women: Separating motherhood from female identity. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Karnes, F. A., & D'Ilio, V. R. (1990). Sex-role stereotyping of leadership positions by student leaders. Perceptual & Motor Skills. 70(1), 335-338.
29. Keating, D. P. (Ed.). (1976) Intellectual talent: research and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Kerr, B. (1983). Raising the career aspirations of gifted girls. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, pp. 37-43.
31. Kramer, L. R. (1991). The social construction of ability perceptions: An ethnographic study of gifted adolescent girls. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(3), 340-362.
32. Leroux, J. A. (1988). Voices from the classroom: Academic and social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(3), 3-18.
33. Loo, Robert, & Thorpe, Karran (1998). Attitudes toward women's roles in society: A replication after 20 years. Sex Roles, 39(11-12), 903-912.
34. Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 111-115.
35. Luftig, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1991). An assessment of the social status and perceived personality and school traits of gifted students by non-gifted peers. Roeper Review, 13(3), 148-152.
36. Luthar, S. S., Zigler, E. & Goldstein, D. (1992). Psychosocial adjustment among intellectually gifted adolescents: The role of cognitive-developmental and experiential factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(2), 361-373.
37. Maines, D., & Hardesty, M., (1987). Temporality and gender: Young adults' career and family plans. Social Forces. 66(1), 103-120.
38. Masling, J. M. (1997). On the nature and utility of projective tests and objective tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69(2), 257-270.
39. McAninch, C. B., Milich, R., Crumbo, G. B., & Funtowicz, M. N. (1996). Children's perception of gender-role-congruent and -incongruent behavior in peers: Fisher-Price meets Price Waterhouse. Sex Roles, 35(9-10), 619-638,
40. McCormick, M. E., & Wolf, J. S. (1993). Intervention programs for gifted girls. Roeper Review. 16(2), 85-88.
41. Meara, N. M., & Day, J. D. (1993). Perspectives on achieving via interpersonal competition between college men and college women. Sex Roles. 28(1-2), 91-110.
42. Monahan, L., Kuhn, D., & Shaver, P. (1974) Intrapsychic versus cultural explanations of the "fear of success" motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(1), 60-64.
43. Monks, F., & Van Boxtel, H. (1995). Gifted adolescents: A developmental perspective. In J. Freeman (Ed.), The psychology of gifted children (pp. 275-295). New York: Wiley.
44. Newman, P. R., & Newman, B. M. (1976). Early adolescence and its conflict: Group identity versus alienation. Adolescence. 11(42), 261-274.
45. Noble, K. D. (1989). Counseling gifted women: Becoming the heroes of our own stories. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 12(2), 131-141
46. Olds, D. E., & Shaver, P. (1980). Masculinity, femininity, academic performance and health: Further evidence concerning the controversy. Journal of Personality, 48(3), 323-341.
47. Orenstein, P. (1995). School girls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Doubleday.
48. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
49. Pomerantz, M., & Schultz, C. B. (1975). The reliability and validity of two objective measures of achievement motivation for adolescent females. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 379-386.
50. Quatman, T., & Watson, C. M. (in press). Gender differences in adolescent self-esteem: An exploration of domains. Journal of Genetic Psychology.
51. Reis, S. M. (1991). The need for clarification in research designed to examine gender differences in achievement and accomplishment. Roeper Review, 13, 193-198.
52. Reis, S. M., & Callahan, C. M. (1989). Gifted females: They've come a long way - or have they? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12(2), 99-117.
53. Rodenstein, J., Pfleger, L., & Colangelo, N. (1977). Career development needs of the gifted: Special considerations for gifted women. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 340-347.
54. Rosen, B. C., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1978). Sex differences in the educational-occupational expectation process. Social Forces, 57(1), 164-186.
55. Sadd, S., Lenauer, M., Shaver, P., & Dunivant, N. (1978). Objective measurement of fear of success and fear of failure: A factor analytic approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(3), 405-416.
56. Sandberg, D. E., Ehrhardt, A. A., Mellins, C. A., Ince, S. E., & Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. (1987). The influence of individual and family characteristics upon career aspirations of girls during childhood and adolescence. Sex Roles, 16, 649-666.
57. Siegle, D., & Reis, S. M. (1998). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of gifted students ability and effort. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 39-47.
58. Silverman, L. K. (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17(2), 110-116.
59. Snipes, R. L, Oswald, S. L., & Caudill, S. B. (1998). Sex-role stereotyping, gender biases, and job selection: The use of ordinal logit in analyzing Likert scale data. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 11(2), 81-97.
60. Spence, J. (1974). The thematic apperception test and attitudes toward achievement in women: A new look at the motive to avoid success and a new method of measurement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(3), 427-437.
61. Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1993). Longitudinal studies of giftedness: Investigating the fulfillment of promise. In K. A. Heller & F. J. Moenks (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 149-160). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
62. Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(5), 507-519.
63. Watson, R. I. (1959). Historical review of objective personality testing: The search for objectivity. In B. M. Bass & I. A. Berg (Eds.), Objective approaches to personality assessment (pp. 1-23), New Jersey: Van Nostrand.
64. Wheeler, L., & Nezlek, J. (1977). Sex differences in social participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 742-754.
65. Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.