U.S. obstetric procedures, 1998

Birth

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 136-138

  Curtin, Sally C ^a   Mathews, T J ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; METHODOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VACUUM EXTRACTION;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES; VACUUM EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL;

EID: 0034208341     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00136.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Births: Final data for 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2000;48(3): 1-2,13-14,70-74.
2. Piper JM, Mitchel EF, Jr, Snowden M, Hall C, Adams M, Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificate using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137:758-768.
3. Buescher PA, Taylor KP, Davis MH, Bowling JM. The quality of the new birth certificate data: A validation study in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1993;83:1163-1165.
4. Green DC, Moore JM, Adams MM, Berg CJ, Wilcox LS, McCarthy BJ. Are we underestimating the rates of vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147: 581-586.