Notation and nature of task in comprehending design rationale

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 215-224

  Heliades, G P ^a   Edmonds, E A ^b  

^a Telesoft Hellas   (Greece)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

DESIGN RATIONALE (DR); SOFTWARE PSYCHOLOGY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0034207447     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00072-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. T.P. Moran J.M. Carroll Overview of Design Rationale T.P. Moran J.M. Carroll Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use 1997 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey
2. A. MacLean R. Young V. Bellotti T. Moran Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis Human-Computer Interaction 6 3 and 4 1991 201 250
3. N. Pennington Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs Cognitive Psychology 19 1987 295 341
4. R. Navarro-Prieto, J.J. Canas, Mental representation and imagery in program comprehension, Proceedings of the 11th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group PPIG-99, Leeds, UK.
5. F. Detienne, What model(s) for program understanding?, Proceedings of UCIS'96, Pointers, France, September 1996.
6. D. Gilmore Methodological considerations in the study of programming J.-M. Hoc T.R.G. Green R. Samurcay D.J. Gilmore Programming, Computers and People Series 1990 Academic Press New York
7. I. Vessey Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature Decision Sciences 22 1991 219 240
8. The IBIS manual: a short course in IBIS methodology, 1996, at www.cmsi.com/business/info/pubs/ibisman/ibismnl2.html.
9. S. Buckingham Shum N. Hammond Delivering HCI modelling to designers: a framework and case study of cognitive modelling Interacting with Computers 6 3 1994 314 341
10. G. Fischer A.C. Lemke R. McCall A.I. Morch Making argumentation serve design Human-Computer Interaction 6 1991 393 419
11. T.C. Ormerod K.I. Manktelow E.H. Robson A.P. Steward Content and representation effects with reasoning tasks in PROLOG form Behaviour and Information Technology 5 2 1986 157 168
12. B. Adelson E. Soloway The role of domain experience in software design IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE 11 11 1985 1351 1360
13. R. Guindon, H. Krasner, B. Curtis, Breakdowns and processes during the early activities of software design by professionals, in: E. Soloway, S. Iyengar (Eds.), 2nd Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, 1986.
14. K.C.B. Yakemovich, J. Conklin, Report on a development project use of an Issue-Based Information System, Proceedings of CSCW'90: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 105–118.
15. D. McKerlie A. MacLean Reasoning with design rationale: practical experience with design space analysis Design Studies 15 2 1994 214 226
16. S. Buckingham Shum Analyzing the usability of a design rationale notation T.P. Moran J.M. Carroll Design rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Use 1997 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey
17. J. Lee, SIBYL: a tool for managing group design rationale, Proceedings of CSCW'90: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 79–92.
18. C. Potts, G. Bruns, Recording the reasons for design decisions, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1988, pp. 418–427.
19. C. Potts K. Takahashi A. Anton Inquiry-based requirements analysis IEEE Software March 1994 21 32