Morphable Surface Models

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 75-91

  Shelton, Christian R ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATTERN MATCHING; TOPOLOGY;

MORPHABLE MODELS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0034205674     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008170818506     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beymer, D. and Poggio, T. 1996. Image representations for visual learning. Science, 272:1905-1909.
2. Beymer, D., Shashua, A., and Poggio, T. 1993. Example based image analysis and synthesis. A.I. Memo 1431, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Bishop, C.M. 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
4. Blanz, V. and Vetter, T. 1999. A morphable model for the syntheis of 3D faces. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, SIGGRAPH'99. pp. 187-194.
5. Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., and Taylor, C.J. 1998. Active appearance models. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2., pp. 484-498.
6. Durbin, R., Szeliski, R., and Yuille, A. 1989. An analysis of the elastic net approach to the traveling salesman problem. Neural Computation, 1:348-358.
7. Durbin, R. and Willshaw, D. 1987. An analogue approach to the travelling salesman problem using an elastic net method. Nature, 326(16):689-691.
8. Garland, M. and Heckbert, P.S. 1997. Surface simplification using quadric error metrics. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, SIGGRAPH'97, pp. 209-216.
9. Heckbert, P.S. and Garland, M. 1997. Survey of polygonal surface simplification algorithms. Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, to appear.
10. Hoppe, H. 1996. Progressive meshes. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, SIGGRAPH'96, pp. 99-108.
11. Hoppe, H., DeRose, T., Duchamp, T., McDonald, J., and Stuetzle, W. 1992. Surface reconstruction from unorganized points. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, SIGGRAPH'92, pp. 71-78.
12. Hoppe, H., DeRose, T., Duchamp, T., McDonald, J., and Stuetzle, W. 1993. Mesh optimization. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, SIGGRAPH'93, pp. 19-26.
13. Jones, M.J. and Poggio, T. 1998. Multidimensional morphable models: A framework for representing and matching object classes. International Journal of Computer Vision, 29(2):107-131.
14. Kang, S. and Jones, M. Personal communication.
15. Kass, M., Witkin, A., andTerzopoulos, D. 1988. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321-331.
16. McInerney, T. and Terzopoulos, D. 1995. Topologically adaptable snakes. In Proceedings of the Fifth Internation Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV '95), pp. 840-845.
17. Nastar, C., Moghaddam, B., and Pentland, A. 1996. Generalized image matching: Statistical learning of physically-based deformations. In Proceedings of Fourth European Conference on Computer Vision.
18. Poggio, T. and Vetter, T. 1992. Recognition and structure from one 2D model view. A.I. Memo 1347, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Popović, J. and Hoppe, H. 1997. Progressive simplicial complexes. In Computer Graphics Proceedings, SIGGRAPH'97, pp. 217-224.
20. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press.
21. Riesenhuber, M. and Poggio, T. 1999. A note on object class representation and categorical perception. Technical Report AI Memo 1679, CBCL Paper 183, MIT AI Lab and CBCL, Cambridge, MA.
22. Riesenhuber, M. and Poggio, T. 2000. CBF: A new framework for object categorization in cortex. In Proceedings of BMCV2000, M.-H. Yoo (Ed.). New York. To appear.
23. Shashua, A. 1992. Projective structure from two uncalibrated images: Structure from motion and recognition. A.I. Memo 1363, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
24. Shelton, C.R. 1998. Three-dimensional correspondence. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Also available as AITR-1650.
25. Ullman, S. and Basri, R. 1991. Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13:992-1006.
26. Vetter, T., Jones, M.J., and Poggio, T. 1997. A bootstrapping algorithm for learning linear models of object classes. A.I. Memo 1600, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27. Vetter, T. and Poggio, T., 1995. Linear object classes and image synthesis from a single example image. A.I. Memo 1531, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.