A Probability Model of Vector Behavior: Effects of DDT Repellency, Irritancy, and Toxicity in Malaria Control

Journal of Vector Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 48-61

  Roberts, Donald R ^a   Alecrim, Wilson Duarte ^b   Hshieh, Paul ^a   Grieco, John P ^a   Bangs, Michael ^c   Andre, Richard G ^a   Chareonviriyaphap, Theeraphap ^d  

^a UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b FUNDAÇÃO DE MEDICINA TROPICAL DR HEITOR VIEIRA DOURADO   (Brazil)

^c US Nav Med Research Unit No 2   (United States)

^d KASETSART UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Anopheles; DDT; Malaria control; Probability model; Vector behavior

Indexed keywords

ANOPHELES DARLINGI; ANOPHELES FUNESTUS; ANOPHELES GAMBIAE; ANOPHELES PUNCTULATUS;

CHLORPHENOTANE;

ANIMAL; ANOPHELES; ARTICLE; DISEASE CARRIER; HOUSING; HUMAN; MALARIA; METHODOLOGY; PEST CONTROL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ANOPHELES; DDT; HOUSING; HUMANS; INSECT VECTORS; MALARIA; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEST CONTROL; PROBABILITY;

EID: 0034203708     PISSN: 10811710     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Casas, M., J. L. Torres, D. N. Bown, M. H. Rodriguez, and J. I. Arredondo-Jimenez. 1998. Selective and conventional house-spraying of DDT and bendiocarb against Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in southern Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 14: 410-420.
2. Chareonviriyaphap, T., D. R. Roberts, R. G. Andre, H. J. Harlan, S. Manguin, and M. Bangs. 1997. Pesticide avoidance behavior in Anopheles albimanus, a malaria vector in the Americas. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 13: 171-183.
3. Charlwood J. D. and N. D. Paraluppi. 1978. O uso de caixas excito-repelentes com An, darlingi Root, An. nuneztovari Gabaldon e Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say obtidos em areas perto de Manaus, Amazonas. Acta Amazonica 8: 685.
4. de Bustamente, F. M., O. S. Pinto, and J. R. De Freitas. 1952. Observacoes sobre of comportamento do An. darlingi em cases experimentais tratadas com DDT e BHC na area de Engenheiro Dolabela, Estado de Minas Gerais. Rev Bras Malariol Doencas Trop 4: 347.
5. Detinova, T. S. 1962. Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. WHO Geneva, 216 pp.
6. Downs, W. G. and E. Bordas. 1951. Control of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in Mexico with DDT residual sprays applied in buildings. Part 5: effectiveness of residual applications of DDT and gammexane up to one year after application under controlled conditions. Am. J. Hyg. 54: 150.
7. Duret, J. P. 1964. Pruebas de excito-repelenciade algunas anofelinos de Panama. Bol. Oficina Sanitaria Panamerica. 57(3): 259-67.
8. Elliott, R. 1972. The influence of vector behavior on malaria transmission. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 21: 755-763.
9. Elliott, R. and J. de Zulueta. 1975. Ethological resistance in malaria vectors. Behavioral response to intradomestic residual insecticides. WHO/VBC (75.569): 1-15.
10. Fernandez-Salas, I., D. R. Roberts, M. H. Rodriguez, M. D. C. Rodriguez, and C. F. Marina-Fernandez. 1993. Host selection patterns of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis under insecticide spraying situations in southern Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 9(4): 375-384.
11. Fernandez-Salas, I., M. H. Rodriguez, D. R. Roberts, A. Rodriguez, and R. Wirtz. 1994. Bionomics of adult Anopheles pseudopunctipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Tapachula foothills area of southern Mexico. J. Med. Entomol. 31: 663-670.
12. Grieco, J. P., N. L. Achee, R. G. Andre, and D. R. Roberts. 2000. A comparison study of house entering and exiting behavior of Anopheles vestitipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) using experimental huts sprayed with DDT or deltamethrin in the southern district of Toledo, Belize, C.A. J. Vector Ecol. (Submitted).
13. Hecht, O. and J. Hernandez. 1960. Resena de las investigaciones sobre la irritacion de Anofelinos por el contacto con superficies cubiertas con DDT. CNEP Boletin. 4(2): 93-106.
14. Lockwood, J. A., T. C. Sparks, and R. N. Story. 1984. Evolution of insect resistance to insecticides: a re-evaluation of the roles of physiology and behavior. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 30; 41-51.
15. Loyola, E. G., M. H. Rodriguez, L. Gonzalez, J. L. Arredondo, D. N. Bown, and M. A. Vaca. 1990. Effect of indoor residual spraying of DDT and bendiocarb on the feeding patterns of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 6: 635-640.
16. Loyola, E. G., M. A. Vaca, D. N. Bown, E. Perez, and M. H. Rodriguez. 1991. Comparative use of bendiocarb and DDT to control Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in a malarious area of Mexico. Med. Veter. Entomol. 5: 233-242.
17. Mancera, O. and J. Hernandez. 1960. El efecto irritante en mosquitos de algunos insecticidas de contacto. CNEP Boletin 4: 82-85.
18. Rachou, R. G., L. A. Schinazi, and M. Moura-Lima. 1966. Preliminary note on the epidemiological studies made in El Salvador to determine the causes of the failure of residual spraying to interrupt the transmission of malaria. Rev. Bras. Malariol. Doencas Trop. 18:763-79.
19. Roberts D. R. and W. D. Alecrim. 1991. Behavioral response of Anopheles darlingi to DDT-sprayed house walls in Amazonia. Bull. PAHO 25: 210-217.
20. Roberts, D. R., W. D. Alecrim, A. M. Tavares, and K. M. McNeill. 1983. Field observations on the gonotrophic cycle of Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 20: 189-192.
21. Roberts, D. R., W. D. Alecrim, A. M. Tavares, and K. M. McNeill. 1984. Influence of physiological condition on the behavioral response of Anopheles darlingi to DDT. Mosq. News 44: 357-362.
22. Roberts, D. R., W. D. Alecrim, A. M. Tavares, and M. G. Radke. 1987. The house-frequenting, host-seeking and resting behavior of Anopheles darlingi in southeastern Amazonas, Brazil. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 3: 433-441.
23. Roberts, D. R. and R. G. Andre. 1994. Insecticide resistance issues in vector-borne disease control. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 50: 21-43.
24. Smith, A. and D. J. Webley. 1969. A verandah trap for studying the house-frequenting habits of mosquitoes and for assessing insecticides. Part 3. The effect of DDT on behavior and mortality. Bull. Entomol. Res. 59: 33-46.