Lost letter returns on five topics from urban, waterfront, and smaller rural communities

Psychological Reports

Volumn 86, Issue 3 PART 2, 2000, Pages 1097-1100

  Bridges, F Stephen ^a   Thompson, Paul C ^b   Willers, Margaret H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COOPERATION; HUMAN; POLITICS; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; URBAN POPULATION;

HELPING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; POLITICS; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL VALUES; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 0034203339     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.86.3.1097-1100     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. BRIDGES, F. S., & CLARK, S. M. (in press) Differences in lost letter responses from smaller rural communities. North American Journal of Psychology.
2. BRIDGES, F. S., & RODRIGUEZ, W. I. (in press) Gay-friendly affiliation, community size, and color of address in return of lost letters. North American Journal of Psychology.
3. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. (1998) Self-reported physical inactivity by degree of urbanization, United States, 1996. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 47 (50), 1097-1100.
4. MILGRAM, S. (1970) The experience of living in cities. Science, 167, 1461-1468.
5. MILGRAM, S., MANN, L., & HARTER, S. (1965) The lost-letter technique. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 437-438.