Current trends in removable prosthodontics

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 131, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2000, Pages 52S-56S

  Melton, A Burton ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEE; HUMAN; MOUTH DISEASE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, COMPLETE; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEES, DENTAL; HUMANS; MOUTH, EDENTULOUS; SMILING;

EID: 0034200785     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0403     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Douglass CW, Ostry L, Shih A. Denture usage in the United States: a twenty-five year projection (abstract 829). J Dent Res 1998;77(special issue A):209.
2. Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, Zion GR. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988-91. J Dent Res 1996;75(special issue): 684-95.
3. Smith S, Heffler S, Freeland M. The next decade of health spending: a new outlook. Health Aff (Millwood) 1999;18(4):86-95.
4. Redford M, Drury TF, Kingman A, Brown LJ. Denture use and the technical quality of dental prostheses among persons 18-74 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75(special issue):714-25.
5. Turbyfill WF. Regaining pleasure and success for complete denture services. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2(5):474.
6. Nogueira SS, Ogle RE, Davis EL. Comparison of accuracy between compression and injection molded complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82(3):291-300.
7. Cune MS, de Putter C, Hoogstraten J. A nationwide evaluative study on implant-retained overdentures. J Dent 1997;25(suppl 1):S13-9.
8. Tinsley D, Watson CJ, Ogden AR. A survey of U.K. centres on implant failures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(1):14-8.
9. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8(3):161-72.