Field efficacy of commercial antimosquito products in Illinois

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 148-152

  Jensen, T ^a   Lampman, R ^a   Slamecka, M C ^a   Novak, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Antimosquito products; Field efficacy; Mosquito repellents

Indexed keywords

DIETHYLTOLUAMIDE; INSECT REPELLENT; INSECTICIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENTEROBACTER AEROGENES; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MOSQUITO; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CULICIDAE; DEET; ENTEROBACTER AEROGENES; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; INSECT REPELLENTS; INSECTICIDES; MOSQUITO CONTROL;

EID: 0034200678     PISSN: 8756971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Belton P. 1981. An acoustic evaluation of electronic mosquito repellers. Mosq News 41:751-755.
2. Bidlingmayer WL. 1980. The range of visual attraction and the effect of competitive visual attractants upon mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) flight. Bull Entomol Res 70:321-342.
3. Cilek JE, Schreiber ET. 1994. Failure of the "mosquito plant", Pelargonium X citrosum 'van Leenii' to repel adult Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus in Florida. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 10:473-476.
4. Clements AN. 1992. The biology of mosquitoes Volume 1. Development, nutrition and reproduction New York: Chapman and Hall.
5. Cochran WG, Cox GM. 1957. Experimental designs New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
6. Foster WA, Lutes KI. 1985. Tests of ultrasonic emissions on mosquito attraction to hosts in flight chambers. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1:199-202.
7. Fradin FW. 1998. Mosquitoes and mosquito repellents: a clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med 128:931-940.
8. Hewitt SE, Farhan M, Urhaman H, Muhammad N, Kamal M, Rowland MW. 1996. Self-protection from malaria vectors in Pakistan: an evaluation of popular existing methods and appropriate new techniques in Afghan refugee communities. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 90:337-344.
9. Kline DL. 1994. Olfactory attractants for mosquito surveillance and control: 1-octen-3-ol. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 10:280-287.
10. Kline DL, Wood JR, Cornell JA. 1991. Interactive effects of 1-octen-3-ol and carbon dioxide on mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) surveillance and control. J Med Entomol 28:254-258.
11. Kutz FW. 1974. Evaluation of an electronic mosquito repelling device. Mosq News 34:369-375.
12. Lewis DJ, Fairchild WL, LePrince DJ. 1982. Evaluation of an electronic mosquito repeller. Can Entomol 114: 699-702.
13. Lindsay LR, Surgeoner GA, Heal JD, Gallivan GJ. 1996. Evaluation of the efficacy of 3% citronella candles and 5% citronella incense for protection against field populations of Aedes mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12:293-294.
14. Matsuda BM, Surgeoner GA, Heal JD, Tucker AO, Maciarello MJ. 1996. Essential oil analysis and field evaluation of the citrosa plant "Pelargonium citrosum" as a repellent against mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 12:69-74.
15. Minitab. 1991. Minitab reference manual. PC version Release 8. State College, PA: Minitab Inc.
16. Nasci RS, Harris CW, Porter CK. 1983. Failure of an insect electrocuting device to reduce mosquito biting. Mosq News 43:180-184.
17. Schreck CE, Weidhass DE, Smith N. 1977. Evaluation of electronic sound producing devices against Aedes taeniorhynchus and Ae. sollicitans. Mosq News 37:529-531.
18. Schreiber ET, Floore TG, Ruff JP. 1991. Evaluation of an electronic mosquito repelling device with notes of the statistical test. J Fla Mosq Control Assoc 62:37-40.
19. Service MW. 1993. Mosquito ecology: field sampling methods 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Applied Science.
20. Snow WF. 1977. Trials with an electronic mosquito-repelling device in West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 71:449-450.
21. Soltavatta O, Singleton RE. 1977. Evaluation of two mosquito-repelling devices. Mosq News 37:195-199.