|
Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 335-337
|
Electroconvulsive Therapy: Clinical Science vs Controversial Perceptions
a a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MENTAL DISEASE;
PUBLIC OPINION;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
CONNECTICUT;
ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MENTAL DISORDERS;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PUBLIC OPINION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
|
EID: 0034200351
PISSN: 00106178
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (10)
|